Monday, May 18, 2009

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News







Muslim Demographic Doomsday


Posted: 17 May 2009 10:44 PM PDT


With the rapid growth of Muslim populations in Europe, Muslim demographics
represents a topic that is on everyone's mind. From the rising radicalism of UK
Muslims to the car burnings that shook Paris to the riots in Brussels and the
growing acceptance that some form of Sharia law will be integrated into
the legal systems of individual European nations-- not just the size, but the
projected size of Muslim populations is behind attitudes toward Muslims.


To many on the left, Muslim populations represent the fall of colonialism and
the rise of true multicultural societies. To many on the right they represent a
threat and the mark of a skull and crossbones across the map of Western
Europe. To many middle of the road politicians, who may identify one way or
another, the Muslims populations are inevitable and must be accommodated.
Such politicians may dislike the social and criminal problems produced by
Muslim growth, but see no way out but to accept it and make the best of it.

That is why seemingly confrontational politicians like Sarkozy in France or
Lieberman in Israel may talk a good game, but while their rhetoric roars
like a lion, their actual policies squeak like a mouse.

This form of Dhimmism is one one of the more disturbing side effects of
Muslim population growth, as politicians thinking themselves farsighted,
resign themselves to the inevitable.

And this of course makes Muslim populations one of the best political
weapons in the hands of Muslim leaders, who make it clear that they are
the future and that nothing short of genocide can change that.

The reality however is far more complicated. For one thing Muslims are
well aware that their strength lines in numbers, not in much of anything
else, and that it is to their advantage to exaggerate those numbers as much
as possible. When Arafat said that the womb of the Palestinian woman was
his best weapon, he was projecting the same basic ultimatum that Muslims
would deliver time and time again to the non-Muslim nations that played
host to them, "We'll outnumber you soon enough, and unless you're
prepared to kill us all, you had better be ready to make a deal with us."

But the perception of a weapon is as important as the reality of a weapon.
Israel began a series of panicked policies, that included the Gaza
Disengagement, as a response to perceived Muslim demographic
superiority. That perception however was wrong. In fact Arab Muslim
births were leveling off, and Jewish births were catching up.

Similarly European leaders have accepted being outnumbered by
Muslims, having Islam dominate Europe and having Sharia become
the law of the land based on a false premise. There are two reasons for
the higher Muslim birthrate, the first is religious or ideological, the
second however is economic. It is not so much that Muslims have a
high birthrate, as that Europeans have come to have a low birthrate.


Socialism has created the bear trap that Europe now finds itself in, by
levying heavy taxation to support a social services infrastructure that
makes raising large families economically difficult, and using that same
social services infrastructure to fund the large families of Muslim
immigrants, imported to compensate for that same low birth rate
and the accompanying shrinking tax base.

Socialism created the problem of Muslim demographics, both in Europe
and Israel, where Arab Muslim families benefit from special payments
made to large families and Israel's extensive health care system. The
same situation is taking place in the United States, though focused more
on immigrants from Latin America.

Yet even when underfunded by Europe's social services system, it is not
clear how many generations Muslim birth rates could sustain themselves.
High birth rates are a reasonable product of a rural system where children
are assets. Child labor laws and high educational barriers in workplaces
curtail those same benefits in urban areas. Sustaining a large Muslim birth
rate in Europe therefore requires constantly importing a fresh supply of
first generation immigrants, a process that Europe can now curtail.

In the Muslim world, high birth rates are set to cause social and economic
crashes of their own. Since Muslim countries have few real exports
besides oil, they have a limited ability to sustain large populations. Those
Muslim countries which do have a strong domestic oil industry tend to
produce the fewest "immigrants of expansion", as opposed to political
and religious refugees. Those Muslim countries without any significant
domestic oil industry are driving much of the immigration to Europe.
Countries like Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan, Lebanon dump their surplus
populations into Europe, America and Australia. They don't want them,
and neither do we.



Immigration serves as a safety valve, dumping radicals and shiftless young
men into European societies that they quickly come to despise. If that
valve was suddenly turned off, half the Muslim countries would collapse or
reform. Possibly a little of both.

Immigration however turns their religious and social problems into our
problems, and eventually our destruction. Meanwhile the perception of an
unstoppable rising Muslim population tide panics politicians and causes
them to throw up their hands in surrender, before they've even seriously
addressed the problem.

Boosting European birth rates, reducing taxation, ending open door social
services for foreigners and drastically curtailing immigration would
reverse the Muslim demographic threat. We are not truly helpless, we
are only being made to feel that way. There are solutions and answers
that can end the helplessness and the shadow of the demographic threat.













No comments:

Post a Comment