applies to Canada too, we are immigrating syrian refugees currently,
so they will bring the shia/sunni war to our streets,
are we stupid???
yeah we are,, duhhhhh
US Ignores Threat of Islamic Terrorism and Invites More Muslim Refugees
http://chersonandmolschky.com/2013/07/12/ignores-threat-islamic-terrorism-invites-muslim-refugees/
Leave a reply
While the main topic of discussion regarding the bill has been amnesty for 11 million illegal immigrants, the bill contains many themes largely ignored, the refugee program being one of them. Now more family members will be allowed to join the refugees. According to WND, “Page 450 of the 1,190 page immigration bill amends what is known as the 2009 Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program. That program, set to expire this year, is now extended to 2018 by the immigration bill.
“The special program previously allotted up to 1,500 visas for Afghans each year. The new immigration bill increases the visa quota to up to 5,000 Afghans per year, a difference detected by reading both the bill and the previous program.”
Read more details: The entire WND article
Protecting those who have helped the US and whose lives are now in danger as a result is a noble cause. The trouble is that many others who fall into this very category have proven that there has not been enough scrutiny in determining who truly is deserving. And let’s not forget all the insurgent attacks which have occurred in Afghanistan. The very same people US soldiers have been training have turned their guns on those trying to help them. In fact, the insurgent attacks had gotten so out of hand, that the US had to temporarily cancel the training program back in September 2012 after 34 insider attacks throughout the year, which killed a total of 45 international troops.
If it seems impossible that insurgents could actually be accepted into the refugee program, history has proven otherwise. My “When Immigration Kills” series sheds light on some refugee terrorists the government allowed into the country, in particular, two Iraqi refugees living in Kentucky who were arrested on terrorism charges in 2011.
Waad Alwan and Mohanad Hammadi were among 56,000 Iraqis who were welcomed into America based on the premise that their lives were in danger. And with an average of around 18,000 Iraqi refugees entering the country each year, that number has since risen dramatically. These refugees must show a real danger in order to qualify for the program. However, something went awry in the case of these two men.
Alwan was and is an enemy to the United States. A sniper and bomb maker in Iraq, he said that his “lunch and dinner would be an American.” His fingerprint was found in 2005 on a roadside bomb intended for US troops and was entered into the Defense Department database. However, in 2009, when he came to the US, this database was not yet a part of the screening process. It is now, but that’s a little too late. There are already tens of thousands of refugees in the country who were able to avoid this security measure.
Both Alwan and Hammadi attacked Americans in their native Iraq. Hammadi participated in IED attacks and was even caught and arrested.
On the run in Iraq, Alwan, a self-proclaimed mujahid, came to America in the hopes of attaining a US passport, not out of pride to be an American, since he quite clearly hates Americans, but for the freedom to travel. “I didn’t come here for America. I came here to get a passport and go back to Turkey, Saudi or wherever I want,” Alwan allegedly said. This is a typical strategy that terrorists use.
Both men pleaded guilty to terrorism charges last year, Hammadi to 12 counts, 4 of which were aiding Al Qaeda in Iraq, and Alwan to 23 counts, including plotting to kill Americans overseas.
Stewart Baker, who developed national security policy during the Bush years, finds the case troubling. “We need to go back and review the files of the people who’ve already been admitted here to make sure that we didn’t make mistakes at the time,” he says.
That means it may be time to give the refugee program an overhaul, Baker stated, according to NPR. (Giving it an overhaul does not mean inviting even more refugees from war-torn nations.)
“This may be the largest or close to the largest national group that we bring to the United States every year, and I wonder whether that’s the smartest choice,” Baker continued.
Apparently many of these Iraqi refugees are indeed under investigation, as FBI Director Robert Mueller reported to a House committee in February 2011. No other details were given as to just how many or who they were.
Another Iraqi refugee bombed a social security office in Casa Grande, Arizona, in November 2012. The perpetrator was Abdullatif Aldosary. He was a convicted felon who had spent eight months in prison for aggravated harassment in 2008 and again was charged in 2009 for violating a court order. Aldosary had also been denied citizenship by the Department of Homeland Security for apparent “terrorism related activity.” Why was he here? This is a refugee?
In 2011, Aldosary had written to Congressman Paul Gosar asking for help in getting permanent residency status. Though he was here legally, as a refugee, he had been denied a green card. Gosar sought answers from the Department of Homeland Security and was told that Aldosary did not qualify for a change in his status “pursuant to the terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility, and that “individuals who engage in terrorism-related activity … are barred from receiving various immigration benefits.”
As it turns out, according to CBS5, Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokeswoman Amber Cargile explained that, “Mr. Aldosary has an adjustment of status petition currently pending with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services after a previous denial of legal permanent resident status due to his participation in an uprising against Iraqi government forces in Basra in March 1991, during the Gulf War.”
Iraqi refugees like Aldosary make up the largest refugee group the US accepts, and they comprise 25% of all those granted refugee status each year. In total, as many as 40% of the annual number of refugees who come into the country are Muslim. People like Aldosary, Hammadi and Alwan, and the Boston Marathon bombing Tsarnaev brothers.
Muslim immigration in general is on the rise in the US. As I previously wrote, a new report by the Pew Forum has analyzed the numbers and found that over the past 20 years, around one million immigrants have been granted permanent residency status every year. But as the report shows, where they are coming from is changing. Whereas before, there were more arriving from Europe and other parts of North America as well as South America, now those numbers are decreasing while those from Asia, Africa and the Middle East are increasing.
What this means is that while there are still many Christians immigrating to the US (though less than before), the number of Muslims is increasing steadily. In 1992, 68% of the new legal permanent residents were Christians, while this number has dropped to only 61% ten years later. Meanwhile, during the same time frame, Muslims comprised 5% of the new legal permanent residents before and have increased to twice as many, 10%, a decade later. Religious minorities once made up one out of every five new legal immigrants, but now they are one out of every four. Some of these religious minorities are Hindus and Buddhists, but they are generally productive members of society and contribute to the economy. They are not the ones responsible for 94% of the world’s terrorism, much of which is directed to the very same Western nations where they are immigrating, and much of which is done now through homegrown terrorism, that which is done by legal immigrants (refugees among them) and mainly naturalized citizens, second generation immigrants or recent Muslim converts.
These numbers are troublesome, but what is worse is the fact that Obama is actually considering inviting Syrian refugees into our country, thereby increasing the number of legal Muslim immigrants even more. But that’s not all. Many of the Syrian rebels have professed their allegiance to Al Qaeda. If we invite them to infiltrate our borders, not only legally but actually welcoming them with open arms, what is to come of this great nation? While before they had to be sneaky about getting here to perform their terrorist acts, now they come legally and are a protected group.
The LA Times has reported that in the near future we could see thousands of Syrian refugees in American towns and cities. There are currently 1.6 million Syrian refugees in other Middle Eastern countries. The idea is that these countries cannot support them all, but shouldn’t they be taking care of their brethren? Why is it the responsibility of the US? And now, more Afghan refugees. So now we have Iraqi, Afghan and possibly Syrian refugees increasing their numbers in America.
We are just asking for more homegrown terrorism.
We’ve already seen this effect with the massive amounts of Iraqi refugees we have taken in. There have been Iraqis arrested and convicted of terrorism plots, honor killings and other crimes, as well as a gang rape case involving who else, but Iraqis once again. Those poor, defenseless refugees.
Immigration has drastically changed in the US. In 1992, 41% of new permanent residents came from the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East-North Africa region or sub-Saharan Africa. But by 2012, this number rose to 53%. Additionally, while the United States accepted around 250,000 immigrants each year in the 1950s, this country is now accepting around one million each year. Of that one million, 260,000 of them belong to other religions besides Christianity, and 130,000 do not belong to any religion. But how many of those 130,000 come from nations with cultures completely different from our own and cultures which teach that America is the enemy? In other words, many of that 260,000 are Muslim, and what about the 130,000 who claim to have no religion? Whether they claim to be religious or not, if they come from a Muslim country, the ideology is imbedded in their culture.
Then these Muslim immigrants have children, and their population multiplies. They build mosques and Islamic cultural centers, which is their right as legal residents and citizens of the United States, the land of opportunity which provides for them that very sought after freedom of religion. But it is in these mosques and cultural centers where many terrorism schemes have been masterminded. There have been multiple FBI and police undercover sting operations which have led to the capture of these terrorists. And secret recordings in mosques throughout the West have uncovered the truth about what imams really preach: it is not peace but rather, that the West is the enemy, that it is ok to rape non-Muslims, death to America, death to the Jews, death to Israel, etc. This is the “religion” we are protecting.
The point is not if we agree with someone else’s religion. If someone wants to believe in G-d, multiple gods, or no gods, they should have that right. However, if people immigrate to a largely Judeo-Christian society, and their religion preaches the destruction of that very society which took them in, this is when it becomes an issue. Or at least, it should.
Not only is modern immigration changing the religious and ethnic make-up of the US and the rest of the West, but it is doing it at an incredibly rapid pace as these numbers demonstrate. Those who openly say without any hesitation that we are their enemy are welcomed into our nation. Diversity is one thing, but if that diversity means more terrorism against us and more economic instability, then it is time to rethink the approach.
By: Rachel Molschky
When Immigration Kills
When Immigration Kills, Part II
When Immigration Kills, Part III: Refugees in America
When Immigration Kills, Part IV: Refugee Terrorists
When Immigration Kills, Part V
Iraqi Refugee a Known Terrorist before Bombing Federal Building in Arizona
Muslim Immigration Is on the Rise
Posts
