|
|
Follow the Middle East Forum
|
|
|
When
We Do and Do Not Like Colonialists
  Be the first of
your friends to like this.
One of the commanders of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
(ISIL), which has reflagged itself to a more compact "Islamic
State" (IS), has thanked Turkey for growing strong enough to conquer
large swathes of Syria and Iraq.
To begin with, it is a nice gesture that the jihadists simplified
their caliphate's name; they must have noticed the worldwide confusion
over acronyms like ISIS and ISIL. Secondly, it is good to know that the
jihadists are not ungrateful barbarians; they know how to thank.
In an interview with the Washington Post on Aug. 12, the commander,
who identified himself as Abu Yousef, said the IS received most of its
supplies from across the Turkish border until a recent crackdown against
the militant group.
"We used to have some fighters — even high-level members of the
Islamic State — receiving treatment in Turkish hospitals. And also, most
of the fighters who joined us in the beginning of the war came through
Turkey and so did our equipment and supplies," Yousef told the
Washington Post. Good, the jihadists are not outright liars either.
And they have a sense of humor too: Yousef said it was no longer easy
for IS members to cross the border and come to Turkey. The jihadist
commander had come to Reyhanlı in southern Turkey to be interviewed by
the Washington Post. Maybe it was because of that irony the Washington
Post's article suggested Turkey's recent measures could prove "too
little, too late."
The IS is a more recent entry into a list of Turkey's old friends/new
foes – the colorful list includes Bashar al-Assad's Syria, Libya, the
UAE, (interchangeably) Saudi Arabia, a rich menu of IS-like jihadist
groups, the Shia government in Baghdad, Egypt and Hassan Nasrallah's Lebanon.
The list has the potential to grow further since Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoğlu's Turkey is no exception to the typical Middle Eastern malady
of succeeding to build tactical alliances based on a common enemy, but
almost always failing to build strategic alliances based on common
well-being.
In a recent speech, Mr. Davutoğlu said, "We are working day and
night to remove colonialists from the Middle East." That effort is
perfectly consistent with the minister's long-held view, which he
highlighted in his magnum opus, the 600-page "Strategic Depth."
In his book, Mr. Davutoğlu argues Muslim nations in the Middle East
should ward off western powers from their backyard and resolve their
problems themselves.
That's a nice wish. All the same, in reality, it was Mr. Davutoğlu's
country that militarily supported a western allied force that toppled the
Libyan regime; called for western military action against Mr. al-Assad;
encouraged U.S. political intervention to stabilize the government in
Baghdad and iron out its differences with the Iraqi Kurds; called for
concerted western action to punish Egypt's president who, eventually, was
elected just like the man he had ousted (and with even a bigger slice of
the Egyptian registered vote); knocked on NATO's doors when it
(presumably) felt threatened by Syria, and, most recently; gave a silent
nod to U.S. air strikes on IS targets.
Mr. Davutoğlu should make up his mind at once if he does not wish to
look, to put it mildly, deeply inconsistent. Do we want major western powers
and colonialists in our backyard in this part of the world, or are we
working day and night to get rid of them?
The frequent journey the Middle East's Islamists make between two
extremes, a deep hatred of "satan" and a pragmatic need for its
services, is too startling not to notice.
A better (more realistic, more honest and less humiliating) rhetoric
could be to say, "We don't want major western powers and
colonialists in our Muslim backyard – unless we need them to better fight
our other Muslim brothers." Of course, the part after the hyphen can
always be read in three or four times a lower pitch.
To really ward off western colonialists, Turkey and all Muslim nations
in the Middle East should at once build an Islamic NATO and an Islamic
EU. Both would be fun to watch.
Burak Bekdil is a columnist for the Ankara-based daily Hürriyet
and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment