Posted: 19 Jan 2015 07:55 AM PST
While Western
newspapers were debating whether or not to reprint the Mohammed cartoons, in
Nigeria as many as 2,000 people were massacred by the Islamic State in
Nigeria, also known as Boko Haram, in what is being called the deadliest
attack by the Muslim group to date.
Survivors
described the Islamic State setting up efficient killing teams and massacring
everyone
while shouting “Allahu Akbar”. "For five kilometers (three miles), I
kept stepping on dead bodies until I reached Malam Karanti village, which was
also deserted and burnt," one survivor said.
There’s a word for that. It’s genocide.
The Islamic State in Nigeria had reportedly managed to kill 2,000 people last
year. This year they did it in one week. But we don’t pay much attention to
what happens in Nigeria unless there’s a hashtag. No one has yet thought up a
clever hashtag for the murder of 2,000 people. #Bringbackourdead doesn’t
really work.
The Islamic State’s next target is Maiduguri, the largest city in Borno with
a population of over a million. Known as the “Home of Peace”, if Maiduguri
falls, the death toll will be horrific.
The Catholic Archbishop, Ignatius Kaigama, warned that the killing wouldn’t
stop in Nigeria. “It's going to expand. It will get to Europe and elsewhere.”
Of course it already has, but not on the same scale.
“We will conquer Europe one day. It is not a question of (if) we will conquer
Europe, just a matter of when that will happen,” an Islamic State spokesman
had warned. “The Europeans need to know that when we come, it will not be in
a nice way. It will be with our weapons.”
“Those who do not convert to Islam or pay the Islamic tax will be killed.”
Imagine that the burning towns and villages aren’t in Nigeria or Syria.
Imagine them in France or Sweden. It’s not that great of a leap from armed
cells carrying out attacks to a militia capturing entire towns and villages.
They’re different phases in the same conflict.
Al Qaeda in Iraq went from a terror group carrying out suicide bombings to
running a state in a decade. So did Hamas in Israel. There are already zones
in Europe under the control of unofficial Sharia police. France has fewer
Muslims than Nigeria and a more stable government with professional police
and military forces. These two factors are the only ones keeping Islamic
genocide at bay.
The massacres in France were carried out by the same types of men and movements
responsible for the killings in Nigeria and Iraq. They just aren’t organized
enough and still lack the numbers to conduct the same large scale genocide
that they are already carrying out in Nigeria, Syria and Iraq.
Two Islamic States, one in Nigeria and another in Iraq/Syria, are engaged in
genocide. Obama delayed responding to ISIS until it was already engaged in
genocide and was moving on Baghdad. His people have done everything possible
to avoid responding to the Boko Haram genocide in Nigeria.
The usual excuses are there. The central governments are compromised,
incompetent and corrupt. The only possible solution is political. The real
issue is poverty. Meanwhile the killing and the denial go on.
The foreign policy infrastructure, the human rights NGOs and the
self-important scribblers who presume to tell the world what is important in
the pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post have fought hard to
avoid connecting the killings by the Islamic State in Nigeria to the killings
by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. And they have fought hardest of all
to avoid connecting these killings to the thousands murdered in the streets
of New York and the latest bodies strewn about Paris. The killings can be
connected with three simple words; global Islamic genocide.
The European intellectuals of the last century were too fixated on their
vision of a better world to understand what was happening in Germany and
Japan. And what had to be done about it. While they dreamed of a world
government that would do away with war, the killing had already begun.
The intellectuals of this century are equally unwilling to take their
attention away from microfinance, climate change and world government to see
the beginnings of a worldwide Holocaust underway.
Genocide isn’t new to Africa or the Middle East so they put it down to local
tribal conflicts. Terrorism isn’t new to America or Europe, so they blame
political extremism. Like the elephant and the blind men who touched its
trunk and thought it was a snake, they respond to the local manifestation of
Islamic genocide by seeing a familiar local phenomenon; tribal war, political
extremism or minority problems.
And anyone who sees the big picture is instantly denounced as an Islamophobe.
But what if the Muslim genocide of Hindus and Buddhists in Asia and the
Muslim genocide of Christians and Jews in the Middle East are part of the
same phenomenon?
What if the Islamic State killers in Nigeria who shout “Allahu Akbar” during
their massacres share a motive with the 9/11 hijackers who were told to
“shout 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the
non-believers”?
What if a common bloody thread of Koran verses runs through the massacres of
non-Muslims in the Philippines and Kenya, in Israel and Australia, in France
and China, in Thailand and Syria?
What if the acts of terror on the evening news are not random events,
workplace violence, mental illness and political extremism, but the beginning
of another global Islamic genocide?
The rise of Islam was not based on faith, but on mass murder.
Within a few centuries of the time that Mohammed had ordered the ethnic
cleansing of Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula, the massacre of
millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists was underway across the
Middle East through India and as far as Afghanistan.
The Islamic Holocaust was the greatest act of mass murder in human history.
And it is still taking place today over a thousand years later.
The decay of the Roman Empire created an opening for the Islamic conquests.
As Western civilization, which plays much the same role as the Roman Empire
did in tying parts of the world together, falls, a new wave of Islamic
conquest and genocide is underway.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,"
George Santayana wrote.
It would be a terrible thing indeed if we were condemned to repeat the mass
murder of hundreds of millions and the eradication of entire civilizations under
the black flag of the Jihad because we refused to remember the past or
acknowledge the present. Because we were too afraid of being called
Islamophobic to speak out for the dead around the world.
It
would be a terrible thing if the Nigerian village of today were to become a
Swedish village tomorrow. It would be an even worse thing if the Muslim
conquests of India were to be repeated in Europe.
Genocide is an ugly word.
It’s a word that we have come to associate with villages in Africa or with
old concentration camps in Europe. We don’t think of it as something that can
happen to us or to our children.
But we should.
The Islamic wars from Nigeria to Israel, from Iraq to Kashmir, are genocidal.
Israel may become the first Western country to suffer Islamic genocide, but
it will not be the last. 9/11 was the first Islamic mass murder of thousands
of Americans, but it will not be the last.
In the face of genocide, our first duty is to warn the world.
The Counterjihad is a war for our survival. It is our resistance to global
Islamic genocide.
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment