Monday, February 16, 2015

Eye on Iran: Iran's Ayatollah Sends New Letter to Obama Amid Nuclear Talks








Join UANI  
 Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
Top Stories

WSJ: "Iran's paramount political figure, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has responded to overtures from President Barack Obama seeking better relations by sending secret communications of his own to the White House. The Iranian cleric wrote to Mr. Obama in recent weeks in response to an October presidential letter that raised the possibility of U.S.-Iranian cooperation in fighting Islamic State if a nuclear deal is secured, according to an Iranian diplomat. The supreme leader's response was 'respectful' but noncommittal, the diplomat said. A senior White House official declined to confirm the existence of that letter. But it comes as the first details emerge about another letter Mr. Khamenei sent to the president early in his first term. That letter outlined a string of abuses that in the supreme leader's view the U.S. had committed against the Iranian people over the past 60 years, according to current and former U.S. officials who viewed the correspondence. The White House official confirmed that the president received that letter in 2009, but declined to comment on the content of any presidential correspondence. Neither the White House nor the Iranian government has officially confirmed any correspondence between the two. Iranian officials, in recent months, though, have told Tehran's state media that some of Mr. Obama's letters were answered, without specifying by whom... Despite its airing of grievances, the first letter in many ways began in earnest the recent historic thaw after more than 30 years of frozen U.S.-Iranian ties, because Mr. Khamenei also didn't rule out the possibility of accommodation with the U.S. That omission-and the sheer fact of the letter itself-fueled initial White House hopes for some sort of breakthrough in relations on Mr. Obama's watch... Mr. Obama, meanwhile, wrote another letter to Mr. Khamenei in October, raising the possibility of cooperation in fighting Islamic State, according to people briefed on the exchange. In his latest response, Mr. Khamenei said improved relations could only be based on mutual trust, said the Iranian diplomat." http://t.uani.com/1DYj9XP

WashPost: "Shiite militias backed by Iran are increasingly taking the lead in Iraq's fight against the Islamic State, threatening to undermine U.S. strategies intended to bolster the central government, rebuild the Iraqi army and promote reconciliation with the country's embittered Sunni minority... As they assume a greater role, the militias are sometimes resorting to tactics that risk further alienating Sunnis and sharpening the sectarian dimensions of the fight. They are also entrenching Iran's already substantial hold over Iraq in ways that may prove difficult to reverse. Backed and in some instances armed and funded by Iran, the militias openly proclaim allegiance to Tehran. Many of the groups, such as the powerful Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kitaeb Hezbollah, are veterans of the fight to eject American troops in the years before their 2011 departure... If the fighting continues on its current trajectory, there is a real risk the United States will defeat the Islamic State but lose Iraq to Iran in the process, said Michael Knights of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy... the militias' chain of command runs through their own leaders, and in many instances directly to Iran. The man appointed to coordinate their activities is Iraq's deputy national security adviser, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the nom de guerre of an Iraqi sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for his role as a top Iraqi commander in Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps. He was convicted in absentia by Kuwait for his part in bombings at the U.S. and French embassies in Kuwait in 1983." http://t.uani.com/1MqqbIo

Fox News: "As conflicts and civil wars rage across the Middle East and North Africa, a shadowy covert cell operating under the Iranian government is fueling the bloodshed. Unit 190, a secret arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's Quds Force made up of about two-dozen employees, has for years smuggled arms to these conflict zones. After an extensive investigation tracing the land, air and sea routes used by the Quds Force to move weapons to Hezbollah, Hamas and now the Houthis in Yemen, Fox News has also learned from western intelligence sources the name of the Iranian man who is a key player in Unit 190: Behnam Shahariyari, born in 1968 in Ardabil, northwest Iran. According to western intelligence sources, Shahariyari runs a network of straw companies -- which skirt sanctions packing RPG's, night-vision equipment and long-range rockets in powdered milk, cement and spare vehicle parts." http://t.uani.com/17H55Wy


   
Nuclear Program & Negotiations

AP: "Iran has denied a report that its supreme leader wrote a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama, the Islamic Republic's official news agency reported, as the country negotiates with world powers over its contested nuclear program. The IRNA news agency quoted Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham as saying the report Saturday by the Wall Street Journal was 'an unprofessional media game.' 'The U.S. president has a record of sending letters and in some cases Iran responded to his letters,' Afkham said Sunday. Neither she nor the IRNA report elaborated on her comments, though Afkham said Iran had no immediate plans to write Obama again." http://t.uani.com/1Bh4Gq5

AFP: "Iran's ultra-conservative weekly '9-Day' was banned on Monday for criticising the government over its negotiations with world powers on the country's controversial nuclear programme, the ISNA news agency reported. The state body charged with monitoring the media ruled that the paper had published articles 'insulting towards the Imam (Islamic republic founder Ayatollah Ruhollah) Khomeini and against the regime's nuclear policy', the agency said. 'Each step (Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad) Zarif took destroyed 100 kilos of reserves of enriched uranium,' the weekly wrote." http://t.uani.com/1FSDyMT

AFP: "China is against another extension of the deadline for Iran to reach a deal with world powers in talks on its nuclear programme, Foreign Minister Wang Yi said in Tehran Sunday. 'They have been extended twice, we hope that they will not be for a third time,' Wang said at a joint news conference with Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif." http://t.uani.com/1v5crNu

Terrorism

Bloomberg: "Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner's last 10 months in office were thrown into turmoil Friday when a prosecutor formally accused her of trying to cover up Iranian involvement in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center that killed 85 people. The accusation could lead to a trial and calls for the impeachment of the president, who under Argentine law has immunity from criminal prosecution while in office... The charges came one month after Alberto Nisman, the former prosecutor in the case, was found dead with a bullet to the head. Nisman had been due to provide evidence for the accusations to lawmakers the following day... In a document filed to a federal court, prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita said Fernandez, Foreign Minister Hector Timerman, lawmaker Andres Larroque and other government supporters tried to remove international search warrants out on Iranian officials, in exchange for trade preferences on grains and oil. The two countries signed a memorandum of understanding in 2013 to set up a joint probe into the bombing, enabling the Iranian officials to give evidence in Iran." http://t.uani.com/1zHDAS7

Human Rights

AFP: "The Berlin film festival wrapped up Sunday after awarding its Golden Bear top prize to Iranian dissident director Jafar Panahi, in a move hailed as a triumph for freedom of expression. 'Taxi' is Panahi's third picture smuggled out of Iran in defiance of an official 20-year filmmaking ban, imposed for a documentary he tried to make on the unrest following Iran's disputed 2009 presidential election. Panahi, who is also barred from travelling abroad and could not attend the festival, said Sunday he was pleased about the award but wished cinemagoers in Iran could watch his films. 'No prize is worth as much as my compatriots being able to see my films,' he said in a rare interview with Iranian media. 'The people in power accuse us of making films for foreign festivals,' he told the semi-official Ilna news agency on behalf of Iranian directors. 'They hide behind political walls and don't say that our films are never authorised for screening in Iranian cinemas.'" http://t.uani.com/1zHBba6

WashPost: "An arch-conservative member of the Iranian parliament and outspoken critic of the country's centrist president has claimed that there is an 'espionage case' against imprisoned Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian and his wife. In remarks published Saturday by the Fars News Agency, Hamid Rasaei said the reporter and his wife, Yeganeh Salehi, have been accused of working with someone in the office of President Hassan Rouhani. He said that they had masqueraded as journalists while 'penetrating into the most sensitive sections at the president's office.' 'Who - through his correspondence - facilitated Jason Rezaian in carrying out his espionage-related activities by allowing him to circumvent important security checks?' Rasaei said." http://t.uani.com/1Ae2iNJ

WashPost: "The family of a Washington Post reporter imprisoned in Iran for more than half a year has engaged a prominent defense attorney known for taking sensitive cases involving Americans ensnared in legal issues in the country. The brother and mother of ¬Jason Rezaian contacted Masoud Shafii, according to Ali Rezaian, the reporter's brother. Reached by phone, Shafii confirmed that he had agreed to seek the court's ¬permission to take the case. Shafii represented three American hikers detained in Iran from 2009 to 2011 on accusations of spying. After his clients were released, Iranian security forces searched Shafii's home and interrogated him for several hours, according to the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran." http://t.uani.com/1JmhiAC

Domestic Politics

AFP: "Iranian lawmakers wore medical face masks in parliament on Sunday in a show of solidarity with residents of their areas battling pollution from strong sandstorms. Sixteen MPs from the western provinces of Khuzestan, Ilam and Kermanshah donned the masks to draw awareness to the plight of their constituents, said official news agency IRNA. Media reports said many Khuzestan residents have been hospitalised suffering respiratory problems, while schools have been closed for the past week. Iran is among the worst polluted countries in the world, and a 2011 report by the World Health Organisation listed Khuzestan city of Ahvaz as the most polluted in the world... On Sunday, authorities urged children and the elderly not to venture outdoors as pollution levels peaked in Tehran." http://t.uani.com/1DxKOye

AP: "Iran's former first vice president has been taken to jail to serve his prison term for corruption, the official IRNA news agency reported Sunday. Mohammad Reza Rahimi, a top aide to former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was convicted by Iran's supreme court last month and sentenced to five years in prison and ordered to pay a 10 billion rial ($300,000) fine. The court also ordered Rahimi to pay compensation equivalent to some $800,000. IRNA said police agents took Rahimi from his residence Sunday and brought him to Evin prison, north of the capital Tehran. The semiofficial Fars news agency said Rahimi was convicted of 'acquiring wealth through illicit methods.' A local court had initially sentenced Rahimi to 15 years but the supreme court reduced the term to five years and three months." http://t.uani.com/1DYfoSe

Opinion & Analysis

Eli Lake in Bloomberg: "In case you haven't heard, peace is about to break out in the Middle East. I realize it doesn't look like that from the headlines: The government just fell in Yemen; Islamic State forces are threatening U.S. Marines in Iraq's Anbar Province; Hezbollah is vowing revenge against Israel for killing the son of one of their beloved mass murderers. But then there is Iran. Thirty-six years after the Islamic Revolution, the mullahs may finally be warming up to the Great Satan. On Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, sent a letter recently to President Barack Obama saying he was open to a more direct alliance against the Islamic State, if negotiators could iron out a deal on Tehran's nuclear program. Khamenei has even said publicly he was open to a deal. Secretary of State John Kerry has been meeting with his counterpart, Javad Zarif. The meetings! The channels! The back channels! Diplomacy! It's the kind of thing that gets the hearts of our Iran-watchers palpitating. Over the years, Iran has sent a string of envoys to meet with Westerners to explain that their country's war against the U.S., Israel, Sunni monarchies, ethnic minorities, gays, journalists and dissidents is all a big misunderstanding. Deep down, many of Iran's leaders just want peace, these emissaries say, but they always end up getting undermined by the hardliners. Now, the hardliner of all hardliners, the supreme leader himself, is talking about peace too. And he's even suggesting an alliance against a common foe. Any day now, he will lead the crowd in chants of 'Life to America!' All of this is tempting. The U.S. has little to show for its on-again-off-again war against Iran, and the two nations' interests should be aligned in the war on terrorism that began after Sept. 11, 2001. The Sunni Islamists of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State consider the Shiites who run Iran to be apostates of the true faith. Iran has been fighting them in Syria and now is fighting them in Iraq. Why can't bygones be bygones? But before declaring Iran's president his generation's Gorbachev, it's worth considering some bad news. To start, Iran has had an opportunistic relationship with al-Qaeda over the years, despite the whole apostasy problem. A year ago, the Treasury Department laid a lot of this out in a designation about al-Qaeda's network in Iran. Terrorist operatives based in Mashhad, near Iran's border with Afghanistan, were allowed to facilitate the transfer of al-Qaeda fighters from Pakistan to Syria through Iranian territory. After 9/11, Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, cut a deal with Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps to allow family members to live in Iran while they moved from Afghanistan to Pakistan. Iran was also a key base in the last decade for al-Qaeda operatives such as Saif al-Adel, who was kept under a house arrest so loose he was able to write a semi-regular Internet column and help plan al-Qaeda's war against the Iraqi government. OK, opportunistic relationships can change. FDR and Stalin were allies against the Nazis, but after the Third Reich collapsed, the U.S. and the Soviet Union fought a cold war. Why can't Iran and America be new allies in a war against the Islamic State? In many ways they already are. The problem is: Iran really loves terrorism. Since 1979, it has used terrorism as a tool of statecraft like no other nation. In his testimony Thursday before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Nick Rasmussen, the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, said Iran and Hezbollah 'remain committed to conducting terrorist activities worldwide and we are concerned their activities could either endanger or target U.S. and other Western interests.' Iran's leaders have been implicated in terrorist attacks in South America, Europe and the Middle East. The Justice Department in 2011 accused Iran of attempting to kill Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Washington at a popular Georgetown restaurant, Cafe Milano. For the Islamic Republic to give up its predilection for terror would require a cultural revolution inside its defense establishment. What would the Quds Force be without car bombers and kidnapping? Some might argue that the 2013 election of President Hassan Rouhani, a supposed reformer, signifies just this kind of change. But there is little evidence he is opening up Iranian society... If Iran is unwilling to stop terrorizing its own people, why should anyone think it will stop terrorizing the citizens of its historic enemies? And this gets to the most important argument as to why an alliance with Iran is a recipe for more war. Iran has been a partner of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad as his troops continue to massacre his own people, causing a death toll conservatively estimated to be north of 129,000. In Yemen, Iran-supported Houthi rebels drove the Obama administration this week to shutter its embassy and CIA station in Sana'a, setting back a crucial war against al-Qaeda's Yemen affiliate. Iran-supported militias in Iraq threaten the Sunni Arab population, driving many potential Sunni allies into the arms of the terrorists. Iran's participation in a coalition against Islamic State forces, while seemingly helpful, threatens to turn a fight against a terrorist group into a bloody, regional sectarian war." http://t.uani.com/1FSKHNe

Mortimer Zuckerman in U.S. News & World Report: "Iran is the gravest threat to world peace. It is tricky enough dealing with Vladimir Putin's land grabs, and the monsters in Iraq-Syria, but at least the West is more or less agreed on the need to resist. What is most alarming about Iran is that the United States, in the person of President Barack Obama, seems to have lost its nerve to stop Iran's final dash to be a nuclear military power, with appalling consequences for the Middle East sooner - and later with missiles that could reach the United States. Iran has got where it is, close to a window of a few months for a bomb, by a pattern of defiance and deceit. It signed the non-proliferation treaty but cheated on it. It resumed the enrichment of uranium it had been ordered never to start. Six times it has ignored resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. It has regularly evaded and lied to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Everyone knows one thing about Iranian leaders: smiling or frowning you can't trust them. It took some time for the Western countries to realize they'd been taken for suckers. When they did, they were more or less obliged to act with force - or acquiesce in Iran's 'right' to enrich uranium. Acquiesce they did until finally provoked to impose sanctions. They worked. Iran came to the negotiating table but failed to meet a deadline and last November got a reward for its intransigence - a seven month extension. And what more could we do to show goodwill? We relax the sanctions that underlay negotiations, having unwisely rejected a congressional vote to tighten them in the face of obduracy. We also give the Iranian theocracy access to $7 billion hard currency they will be able to use for their criminal purposes. Why do that when sanctions were demoralizing the country? Relaxation was a godsend for Iran's staggering economy. It was the one pressure we had to force Iran to give up its pursuit of nuclear weapons and we have given it away. Obama, who has more than once pledged we would do 'what we must' to stop them, is now repositioned to doing what we must to keep them talking while they continue with their nuclear effort. Since Obama led the 5+1 negotiating countries to the recent agreement in Geneva, nobody is very sure even what the U.S. wants. The president ignored the region's alarm, leading to the strange new relationship between Israel and the Saudi and Gulf governments who are all threatened by Iran's growing military force. Why does Obama want a detente with Tehran that risks upending America's entire stance in the Middle East? His apparent belief in Iranian bona fides is astonishing, for he must recognize that once the matrix of sanctions starts to unravel, it will be hard, maybe impossible, to get it reinstated. The only thing the Geneva agreement accomplished is to provide Iran with another six months to perfect its nuclear weapons program. In effect the U.S. military option has been taken off the table, leaving the sole burden for eliminating Iran's nuclear capability to Israel. A great power should not behave this way, especially after a three-decade-long war that has injured countless and cost thousands of American lives... What we had to do was work toward a broad coalition including Russia, the European Union, the Sunni Arab countries and Israel, which along with the United States would have forced the Iranians to abandon their nuclear project just as Libya did in 2003. Instead what we have is the Geneva agreement, which is an illusion. All the options now left on the table are dire. The Iranians can run out the clock until their nuclear project is completed." http://t.uani.com/17GZU8V

Mary Rezaian in CNN: "My son Jason Rezaian and his wife were taken at gunpoint from their apartment in Iran more than 200 days ago. Since then, he has been languishing in a jail with no firm trial date in sight. Our patience has been exhausted. It is time to release my son or let him face a fair trial... There are rumblings that Jason's case will not be heard until after Nowruz, the Persian New Year, which is on the first day of spring, March 21. Anyone with knowledge of Iran knows that nothing happens during the two weeks following Nowruz, a period when even newspapers don't publish, so it can only be assumed his trial date might not be set before April 6... Our family has been exceedingly patient during these seven months. We have been respectful of Iran, of its laws and its procedures. But our patience ran out some time ago, and it is difficult, nearly impossible, to maintain respect for a system under which someone who was born and raised American is being detained 'as an Iranian' even as his rights under Iran's own laws are being so flagrantly violated." http://t.uani.com/1zipWGb
       

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment