Posted: 16 Mar 2015 06:54 AM PDT
When Republicans
complained that Obama refused to talk about Islamic terrorism, he accused
them of playing into the hands of ISIS by demanding that he identify the
enemy we’re fighting.
When
they spoke out against his Iranian nuclear sellout, he accused them of
“wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran”. Those hardliners
would presumably toe a harder line than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
who responded to Obama’s outreach in his first term by saying, “The Islamic
peoples all over the world chant ‘Death to America!’” and who stated last
year that “This battle will only end when the society can get rid of the
oppressors’ front with America at the head of it.”
(The Supreme Leader of a country which stones teenage rape victims and rapes
teenage girls so that they don’t die as virgins, also claimed that “The
European races are barbaric.”)
If the moderate Supreme Leader that Obama is dealing with wants Death to
America, what could the real hardliners want for America that’s even worse
than death? A third term of Obama?
Meanwhile Joe Biden, Obama’s number two, accused Republicans of undermining
Obama. This would be the same Biden who threatened to impeach President Bush
if he bombed Iran’s nuclear program and who blasted Bush and the idea of an
Axis of Evil at a fundraiser in the home of a pro-Iran figure.
Biden undermined President Bush’s efforts to rein in Iran’s terrorism by
voting against listing the Revolutionary Guard, which was supplying weapons
to help the Taliban kill American soldiers, as a terrorist group (a position
he shared with Kerry, Hagel and Obama) and berating Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice for not negotiating with Iran and Assad.
The toadying of “Tehran Joe” to Iran had already reached its absolute lowest
point when Biden responded to the terrorist attacks of September 11 by
suggesting, “Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings
attached, a check for $200 million to Iran.”
The administration that Biden is part of has instead been releasing $490
million a month to Iran.
Biden, along with Kerry and Hagel, became notorious as the Tehran Trio during
the Bush years for their advocacy for Iran and Assad, and their appearances
at pro-Iranian lobbying groups and fundraisers despite criticism from Iranian
democracy advocates. Biden, Kerry and Hagel, Obama’s VP, the Secretary of
State and the former Secretary of Defense, all appeared at American-Iranian
Council events, a group whose founder stated that he is “the Iranian lobby in
the United States.”
Treason doesn’t get more treasonous than that.
Obama and Biden, along with their political allies, are trying to spin their
shameless pandering to a terrorist state as patriotic and opposition to it as
treasonous. The New York Daily News denounced senators opposed to an Obama
deal giving Iran the ability to develop and deploy nuclear weapons as
“Traitors”. The administration’s social media allies’ hashtag dubbed
Republicans opposed to Iran’s nuclear weapons as #47Traitors.
Traitors oppose terrorists getting nuclear weapons. Patriots like Joe Biden
not only support it, but they blast a president trying to stop it while
collecting $30,000 at a pro-Iranian fundraiser.
“Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?” Sir John Harrington
cynically observed. “Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” But the
Elizabethan courtier left out that when traitors rule, patriotism becomes
treason. Obama commits treason and taunts his critics as traitors.
Republicans who want to see American leadership rise to the challenge of ISIS
and Iran are accused of collaborating with ISIS and Iran by an administration
that willfully lied and misrepresented the growth of ISIS for as long as it
could and that is now doing the same thing for Iran’s nuclear threat.
Obama lied and claimed that ISIS was no threat even when it was taking over
entire cities. Only overt genocide by ISIS forced him into his current
stumbling action against it. Now the same sports fan who dubbed ISIS a
“Jayvee” team not worth bothering with accuses Republicans of playing into
its hands.
Sensible people consider letting a terrorist group win to be
“playing into its hands”. Left-wing apologists for terror however claim that
fighting terrorists “plays into their hands”. In the same inverted worldview
in which patriotism becomes treason and treason becomes patriotism, what
terrorists want most is for you to bomb them to oblivion while what they fear
most is that you’ll just stand there and let them kill you.
Now Obama suggests that critics of his Iran nuclear sellout are playing into
the hands of some imaginary hardliners who want America to bomb its nuclear
program. These imaginary hardliners, like the imaginary terrorists, want to
sabotage their own efforts to achieve their goals. And only Obama stands
between them and the failure of their terroristic and nuclear ambitions.
That’s why he’s a patriot.
And if you can follow all that, you qualify for a gig as the State
Department’s new spokesperson.
Ignoring terrorists is patriotic. Fighting them is unpatriotic. Dealing with
their actual beliefs is unpatriotic. Pretending that they have no beliefs, no
matter how impossible it makes it to predict their actions and fight them, is
patriotic. Stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons is unpatriotic. The
patriotic thing to do is to cut a deal that will let Iran go the way of North
Korea.
Through the intercession of Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton struck a non-binding
agreement with North Korea on its nuclear weapons program. Like Obama’s Iran
deal, the Senate never got to ratify it. Secretary of State Madeline Albright
stated that "the framework agreement is one of the best things that the
administration has done because it stopped a nuclear weapons program in North
Korea." It didn’t.
During his original campaign, Obama said, “We cannot allow Iran to get a
nuclear weapon.” That should sound familiar. Bill Clinton said during his
first term in office, “North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear
bomb.” North Korea could and did. Bill Clinton knew all along that it could
and would.
The rhetoric from back then also sounds familiar. Congressman Obey warned
that Republicans dropping millions in fuel oil for North Korea was
“mindbogglingly reckless.” The Honolulu Star-Bulletin urged “Stop GOP
Meddling in Foreign Affairs.” Gore ranted that Republicans were “determined
to wreck a presidency in order to recapture it” and accused them of
“isolationism and defeatism”.
The Republicans were right. North Korea got the bomb and a lot of freebies
from American taxpayers. The men and women responsible for supporting that
disastrously treasonous policy slimed them for it. Now we’re in a repeat with
many of the same politicians and pundits arguing that the only way to stop
Iran from getting the bomb is by not doing anything to stop it from getting
the bomb.
The first rule of treason is to call the other guy a traitor. Having aligned
with everyone from Castro to the Supreme Leader of Iran, Obama has to make it
seem as if it’s the Republicans who are the traitors.
An
administration of political hacks who spent the Bush years undermining the
White House in every way possible short of officially defecting to the enemy
now claim that dissent from their policy is treason. And they top that by
reversing the motives of Iran and ISIS so that instead of wanting to destroy
America, they really want to be criticized by Republicans and prevented from
getting nuclear weapons.
This gibberish shouldn’t be able to fool any thinking person, but the idea
that Kim Jong-Il wanted food, not nuclear weapons, when his entire policy had
been the exact opposite, shouldn’t have gotten by anyone with an elementary
knowledge of history and at least a single living brain cell.
But it did.
No one wants to be a member of a party of traitors or of a government of
traitors. Clinton and Obama didn’t accidentally stumble into their policies.
They were guided by a deep rotten belief that the United States was always
wrong and that the enemy, no matter how evil, had a legitimate grievance.
They can’t admit to this treasonous idea, even though they repeat it
constantly in various forms, so their only defense is to claim that their
treason is patriotism and that anyone who disagrees is a traitor.
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment