Join UANI
Top Stories
NYT:
"Leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee negotiated into
the night on Monday to soften language and possibly shorten a
congressional review period in legislation that would give Congress
influence over the shape of President Obama's nuclear accord with Iran.
The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, Congress's first legislative
effort to muscle into the continuing talks to rein in Iran's nuclear
program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions, will
formally go before the committee on Tuesday afternoon. Senator Bob
Corker, Republican of Tennessee, the panel's chairman, and Senator
Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, its ranking Democrat, pushed to reach
bipartisan consensus by Tuesday morning, then join forces to stave off
threats to the bill from the right and the left. A Democratic aide
familiar with the negotiations said Monday night that Mr. Cardin was
optimistic that a bipartisan accord would be reached by morning. To try
to get there, Mr. Corker and Mr. Cardin focused on watering down two provisions.
One would require the president to certify every 90 days that Iran is
not supporting terrorist attacks against Americans, an issue that has
not been part of the nuclear negotiations. The other would prevent the
president from waiving any sanctions until the expiration of a 60-day
congressional review period." http://t.uani.com/1NCtRdc
Bloomberg:
"Lawmakers skeptical about an Iran nuclear deal said U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry's plea for more time to complete an
agreement did little to dissuade them from insisting that Congress must
review any final plan. After a two-hour private briefing Monday for
House members on the Iran deal by Kerry, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew
and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, several Republicans said Congress
deserves a vote and that many questions about the framework for an
accord are unresolved. 'I really am concerned' the deal could let Iran
become a nuclear state, said House Armed Services Chairman Mac
Thornberry, a Texas Republican. 'I think that's a real problem.' ...
The three secretaries will hold a similar session for senators Tuesday.
The briefings are part of a White House effort to fend off interference
from Congress that might thwart negotiations over the next three months
on a final deal... House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, a California
Republican, said if the Senate passes that measure, the House of
Representatives will take it up and can pass it with 'high
numbers.'" http://t.uani.com/1DZ4JZv
WT:
"The U.S. and Iran are still sparring over whether and when
economic sanctions will be lifted in the wake of a nuclear deal, but
some of Tehran's traditional trading partners aren't waiting for the
gates to officially swing open again. Turkey's president traveled to
Tehran last week for meetings that produced eight accords on commercial
and industrial cooperation. China is preparing a deal to build a
long-delayed natural gas pipeline between Iran and Pakistan, to start
once sanctions are eased. A trip by India's commerce minister to Iran
last week produced an invitation for Indian Prime Minister Narendra
Modi to visit for a state dinner to discuss expanded economic ties.
Russia became the latest - and most controversial - country to seek
economic deals with Iran when President Vladimir Putin said Monday that
he was lifting the ban on a long-stalled $800 million missile
agreement. Then there are Iran's vast oil holdings that are bottled up
because of the sanctions... Real estate developers and financing banks
in Dubai, such as Damac Properties Dubai Co. and Dubai Islamic Bank
PJSC, for example, are making plays for Iranian properties. Dubai will
get a 5 percent boost to its economy from lifting sanctions on Iran,
according to Hasnain Malik, the head of frontier-markets equity
strategy at Exotix Partners LLP in Dubai." http://t.uani.com/1yqNZrY
Nuclear Program & Negotiations
Fars (Iran):
"Director General for Political Affairs at the Iranian Foreign
Ministry and nuclear negotiator Hamid Baeidinejad... underscored the
necessity for the removal of all sanctions against Tehran, and stressed
that 'all the EU, US and UN Security Council sanctions will be
terminated on the first day that final nuclear deal comes into effect',
if any such agreement is struck between Iran and the six world powers.
Noting that 'Iran holds no trust in the US', Baeidinejad said, 'We only
negotiate on equal footing.' He also emphasized Tehran's determination
to continue Research and Development (R&D) activities after a
possible nuclear deal with the G5+1, and said 'Iran will continue
nuclear fusion technology' even after a final deal with the
powers.'" http://t.uani.com/1DZ8lef
Mehr (Iran):
"Iran's senior nuclear negotiator has told a group of students in
Islamic Azad University fact-sheet publishing is conditioned on the
authorities' approval. Hamid Baeidinejad responded to nuclear questions
on Monday in a meeting with Islamic Azad University Medical School
students. Baeidinejad told the students that fact-sheet was prepared
before and would be published whenever the higher authorities of the
country agreed to. On a question whether a period of six months
would be enough for implementation of provisions of comprehensive deal,
Baeidinejad said that negotiators were far from addressing the details
of the agreement deal; 'with the same token, I would not give you an
assessment of the time needed for implementation of the provisions,' he
added. Baeidinejad, however, believed that definitely the six-month
period would seem unrealistic, and that 'Iranian side would consider
shorter time period.' On a different question about remarks by US
Secretary of State John Kerry who said that they would be committed to
articles of their fact-sheet, nuclear negotiator told the reporters
that the US fact-sheet was different from Iranian fact-sheet, and was
an interpretation of the joint statement; 'our fact-sheet is what has
been said by our officials,' he said." http://t.uani.com/1aZGcXO
WSJ:
"The White House is increasingly arguing that partisanship is
driving Republican opposition to the emerging Iran nuclear agreement, a
tack that suggests President Barack Obama has determined that peeling
off Democratic support is the best way to defeat legislation that would
curb his authority to strike a deal with Tehran. 'There are a lot of
members of Congress who, quite frankly, are not willing to evaluate
this deal on the merits. They evaluate this deal based on whether or
not President Obama supports it and, if he does, then they're going to
oppose it,' press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday. 'That's the kind
of partisanship that has infected so much of what this president has
tried to do over the course of the last six years. And it's unfortunate
that it's emerging in the context of such a critical national security
priority for the United States. But the fact is that's what
happening.'" http://t.uani.com/1NCLV6W
WSJ:
"Some Senate Democrats are pushing to shorten the amount of time
Congress would have to review a final nuclear deal with Iran under
legislation due for a committee vote on Tuesday... Sen. Chris Coons
(D., Del.) said he backs a proposal to halve the review period to 30
days after a final deal is reached... 'Now that we've got the broad
outlines of the framework and are getting more thorough briefings from
the White House, we should be able to review and provide input on the
bill responsibly in 30 days or less,' Mr. Coons said. Mr. Corker
declined to comment on whether he would support shortening the
congressional review period, but said there was a 'likelihood' that he
would reach an agreement on a package of amendments worked out with
Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland, the committee's top Democrat. The two
spoke over the weekend extensively on the phone, Mr. Corker said."
http://t.uani.com/1csbIOB
WSJ:
"Iran thinks that Russia will deliver its powerful S-300
surface-to-air missile systems this year, Ali Shamkhani, secretary of
Iran's Supreme National Security Council, told the Interfax news agency
in Moscow on Tuesday. The comment comes a day after the Kremlin lifted
the ban on delivery of S-300 missile air-defense system, which cast
doubt on the international effort to curb Iran's nuclear program and
sparked criticism from the White House. 'I think that [the S-300] will
be delivered this year,' Mr. Shamkhani said according to Interfax. 'The
elimination of this issue will foster further development of our
bilateral relations,' he said. Mr. Shamkhani also said that 'great
strategic possibilities exist in the relations between Russia and
Iran.' However, Nikolai Patrushev, one of Russian President Vladimir
Putin's top advisers and Russian Security Council secretary, told
Interfax that delivery of the missile system 'will take some time.'
When the systems will be delivered 'depends on our manufacturers. I
think it will be a minimum of half a year to finish the work,' he told
the news agency." http://t.uani.com/1yqCKQe
AFP:
"Israel on Monday denounced Russia's decision to lift a ban on
supplying Iran with sophisticated S-300 air defence missile systems as
proof of Tehran's newfound 'legitimacy' following nuclear talks. 'This
is a direct result of the legitimacy that Iran is receiving from the nuclear
deal that is being prepared, and proof that the Iranian economic growth
which follows the lifting of sanctions will be exploited for arming
itself and not for the welfare of the Iranian people,' Israeli
Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz said in a statement... 'As Iran
disavows clause after clause of the framework agreement... the
international community has already begun implementing easing
measures,' he railed. 'Instead of demanding that Iran stop its
terrorist activity in the Middle East and the world, it is being
allowed to arm itself with advanced weaponry that will only increase
its aggression.'" http://t.uani.com/1Deo3hS
Free Beacon:
"Russia's announcement on Monday that it will proceed with the
sale of advanced missile systems to Iran crosses a so-called 'red line'
established by the Obama administration in 2010, according to comments
by senior administration officials. Following years of dissent from the
United States, Russia announced on Monday that it would proceed with
the sale of the advanced S-300 air defense missile system to Iran,
which has been vying to purchase the hardware for years... Russia's
decision to arm Tehran with the S-300 system erodes a long-promoted
narrative by the Obama administration about its success in preventing Russian
proliferation. One senior Obama administration official speaking in
2010 described the S-300 sale as a 'red line' for the United States
that 'couldn't be crossed,' according to Foreign Policy." http://t.uani.com/1NCCFjg
Reuters:
"Nuclear talks between Iran and world powers will resume on April
21 at the deputy level, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif
said on Tuesday, in what will be the first meeting since a major
breakthrough two weeks ago... 'My colleagues, with the deputy to (European
Union foreign policy chief) Federica Mogherini and other political
directors from the E3+3 will get together next Tuesday to start
drafting,' Zarif said during a visit to Madrid... Zarif did not specify
where the coming round of talks would take place." http://t.uani.com/1NCz2K8
Congressional
Action
Bloomberg:
"Senator Bob Corker said he wants a Senate panel to vote Tuesday
on a bill that would give Congress 52 days to review, and potentially
reject, a nuclear arms deal with Iran before sanctions are lifted
against the Islamic republic. 'Those congressional sanctions cannot be
waived until Congress completes its work,' Corker, a Tennessee
Republican and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said on
Bloomberg TV Tuesday... He declined to say whether or not the bill --
which appears to have enough votes for passage -- had the support of
enough Democrats to reach the 67 senators needed to override a
presidential veto. 'We'll see,' he said. 'I don't ever count my
chickens before they're hatched.'" http://t.uani.com/1cshj7i
Sanctions
Relief
Bloomberg:
"As world powers move toward ending Iran's international
isolation, bargain-hunting stock investors are circling. The primary
focus for many of them, though, isn't Iranian companies themselves, but
rather multinationals that are located in nearby countries as well as
those that have kept ties with the Islamic republic during sanctions.
Their business, the thinking goes, would get a big lift from an opening
up of the Middle East's second-biggest economy... The biggest
beneficiaries could include banks and developers in Dubai and a
Malaysian shipper that may see orders climb if Iran resumes global oil
exports. Here are 16 stocks identified by analysts at firms including
Exotix Ltd., Global Securities and Erste Securities Istanbul as
potential winners." http://t.uani.com/1NCO7v7
Regional
Destabilization
Arab News:
"Saudi Ambassador to Bahrain Abdullah Al-Asheikh said that leaders
of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) will inform the US
administration, during their expected joint meeting at Camp David later
this spring, that they will not be silent if they find the Iranian
nuclear deal threatens their countries, adding, 'In this case, we will
do our best to stop it.' At the same time, the ambassador hoped that
the result of Camp David summit between US and GCC leaders would
convince the US administration to take its allies' interests in the
Middle East into account. He also clarified that the US must know GCC
leaders' visions to protect their security and stability... 'We
disagree with countries who seek to dominate, expand into our countries
and interfere in our internal affairs. This is what has been done by
Iran and we will protect our nations, and our security and stability.
We are capable of doing it,' he added." http://t.uani.com/1ynlfQE
Human Rights
IHR:
"Eight prisoners were hanged in Alborz province (west of Tehran)
this morning, reported the Iranian state media. According to the
official website of the Judiciary in Alborz Province, the prisoners who
were executed this morning were all convicted of drug-related
charges... According to reports by Iran Human Rights (IHR), at least
2052 prisoners have been executed between 2010 and 2014. Drug convicts
are tried by the Revolution Courts behind the closed doors and many of
the prisoners are sentenced to death based on the confessions they have
given under torture." http://t.uani.com/1OvHgR7
IHR:
"Six prisoners have been hanged in two different prisons according
to the official Iranian sources... The judiciary in Markazi province
(central Iran) reported about the execution of four prisoners convicted
of drug-related charges on April 12... According to unofficial reports
16 prisoners were hanged in the Ghezelhesar prison of Karaj (west of
Tehran) early Monday morning April 13. All these prisoners were
convicted of drug-related charges." http://t.uani.com/1DDLeUf
Opinion &
Analysis
WashPost
Editorial: "We're guessing it's not a coincidence
that the latest, disturbing report about Jason Rezaian, The Post's unjustly
imprisoned correspondent in Iran, comes just after the government of
Hassan Rouhani accepted a preliminary accord on the country's nuclear
program. On Sunday, the Fars news agency, which is believed to be close
to Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, issued a dispatch saying that Mr.
Rezaian faced charges of 'espionage' and 'acting against national
security.' It went on to sketch a case against the reporter that would
be laughable were it not being used to justify an outrageous human
rights abuse. Not for the first time, Mr. Rezaian looks like a pawn in
Iran's domestic power struggle over the nuclear deal. That makes it all
the more urgent that Mr. Rouhani demonstrate his ability to control his
opposition by arranging Mr. Rezaian's immediate release. Mr. Rezaian,
who was born and raised in California, had been jailed for 265 days as
of Monday, far longer than any Western journalist previously detained
in Iran. In violation of Iranian law, he still has not been brought to
trial, and prosecutors have never officially reported the charges
against him. He was denied the lawyer chosen by his family, and his
court-approved attorney has not yet met with him... What's clear is
that Mr. Rezaian continues to be held in Tehran's notorious Evin Prison
long after Mr. Rouhani's foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif,
described him as ' a good reporter ' and expressed the hope that ' he
will be cleared in a court of law .' Again the question arises: If Mr.
Rouhani and his foreign minister cannot stop the persecution of an
American journalist they know to be innocent, can they be counted on to
deliver on the commitments they made in the nuclear talks?" http://t.uani.com/1JGPzH8
WSJ Editorial:
"Vladimir Putin blew a geopolitical raspberry at the Obama
Administration on Monday by authorizing the sale of Russia's S-300
missile system to Iran. The Kremlin is offering the mullahs an
air-defense capability so sophisticated that it would render Iran's
nuclear installations far more difficult and costly to attack should
Tehran seek to build a bomb. Feeling better about that Iranian nuclear
deal now? The origins of this Russian sideswipe go back to 2007, when
Moscow and Tehran signed an $800 million contract for delivery of five
S-300 squadrons. But in 2010 then-President Dmitry Medvedev stopped the
sale under pressure from the U.S. and Israel. The United Nations
Security Council the same year passed an arms-embargo resolution
barring the sale of major conventional systems to the Tehran regime.
That resolution is still in effect, but the Kremlin no longer feels
like abiding by it. With the latest negotiating deadline passed and
without any nuclear agreement in place, Moscow will dispatch the S-300s
'promptly' to the Islamic Republic, according to the Russian Defense
Ministry. So much for the White House hope that the West could cordon
off Russia's aggression against Ukraine while working with Mr. Putin on
other matters. Russia and the West could disagree about Crimea and
eastern Ukraine, the thinking went, but Washington could still solicit
the Kremlin's cooperation on the Iranian nuclear crisis. State
Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki dismissed news in February that
Russia's state-run weapons conglomerate Rostec had offered Tehran the
Antey-2500-an upgraded version of the S-300 system. 'It's just some
reports,' she said. White House spokesman Josh Earnest similarly
boasted in March of how 'international unanimity of opinion has been
critical to our ability to apply pressure to Iran.' Now Mr. Obama wants
to delegate responsibility for enforcing his nuclear deal with Iran to
the United Nations, which means that the Russians will have a say-and a
veto-there, too. Think of this missile sale as a taste of what's to
come." http://t.uani.com/1Ho0t5p
President of
Yemen Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi in NYT: "My country,
Yemen, is under siege by radical Houthi militia forces whose campaign
of horror and destruction is fueled by the political and military
support of an Iranian regime obsessed with regional domination. There
is no question that the chaos in Yemen has been driven by Iran's hunger
for power and its ambition to control the entire region. The Houthi
attacks are unjust acts of aggression against the Yemeni people and the
constitutional legitimacy of my government, as well as an assault on Yemen's
sovereignty and security. The Houthi rebels are puppets of the Iranian
government, and the government of Iran does not care for the fate of
ordinary Yemenis; it only cares about achieving regional hegemony. On
behalf of all Yemenis, I call on the agents of chaos to surrender and
to stop serving the ambitions of others. It is not too late to stop the
devastation of my nation. The Houthis belong at the negotiating table,
not on the battlefield terrorizing their fellow citizens... Two weeks
ago, Yemen was on the brink of the abyss. The unprecedented level of
Arab and international support brought us back from the edge. The
message they are sending is clear: Iran cannot continue expanding at
the expense of the integrity and security of other countries in the
region. Our neighbors are certain of what they see: one house in the
neighborhood is on fire, and that fire must first be contained and then
extinguished lest the entire neighborhood turn to ashes. We will need
continued international support to ensure military might on the
battlefield now. And we will need assistance for our civil institutions
once the fighting has stopped, to return my government to leadership in
the capital, Sana. Having a hostile government in a nation bordering
the Bab al-Mandeb strait - the highly trafficked shipping lane leading
to the Suez Canal - is in no nation's interest. If the Houthis are not
stopped, they are destined to become the next Hezbollah, deployed by
Iran to threaten the people in the region and beyond. The oil shipments
through the Red Sea that much of the world depends on will be in
jeopardy, and Al Qaeda and other radical groups will be allowed to
flourish." http://t.uani.com/1GGTuFw
Eric Edelman
& Tzvi Kahn in Politico: "Unfortunately, past
American efforts to enforce arms control agreements offer reason to
doubt that the United States will actually hold Iran accountable for
any violations-just as Khamenei's speech suggests that Tehran will take
full advantage of this. One 1987 arms control agreement between the United
States and Russia is a case in point. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear
Forces (INF) Treaty, which requires both Washington and Moscow to
eliminate ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 kilometers to
5,500 km, marked the culminating point of a tense Cold War standoff and
was a key milestone toward its end. Yet for years, Russia has sought to
subvert it. In 2005, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov asked his
American counterpart, Donald Rumsfeld, for his views about the
possibility of Moscow's withdrawal from the INF. The discussion was not
merely academic. As the Financial Times reported at the time, 'The fact
that Russia's military establishment was considering such a radical
break with a pillar of the international arms control regime reflected
a serious deterioration in relations between Russia and the West.' In
subsequent years, Russia would continue to express discontent with the
treaty. In 2006, Ivanov called the treaty a relic of the Cold War. In
2007, he said that Russia was weaker because of it, while President
Vladimir Putin asserted that it should be transformed into a global
treaty. In 2008 the Bush Administration joined with Russian in an
effort to do just that at the United Nations, with no takers. In May
2012, after a failed attempt the year before, Russia successfully
test-launched the RS-26 Rubezh (Russian for 'frontier') missile at a
distance of 5,800 km - a distance far enough to qualify as an
intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), which the INF does not
prohibit. But subsequent tests of the Rubezh featured a modified,
heavier payload that reduced its range to approximately 2,000 km, which
the INF Treaty does prohibit, thereby signaling a prior, longer-term
Russian intention to violate it. In 2013, the Obama administration inexplicably
dismissed claims that the Rubezh test-launch may have violated the INF.
It was not until January 2014 that American officials shifted course
and informed NATO of a potential Russian INF violation, and not until
July of the same year that the State Department officially accused
Russia of violating the Treaty. In congressional testimony last month,
Defense Secretary Ashton Carter further acknowledged the violations.
'The INF Treaty is a two-sided treaty,' he said. 'They said they
wouldn't do something. We say we wouldn't do something. And they've
done what they weren't supposed to do.' This sad case study offers
useful lessons for any prospective nuclear deal with Iran. While Moscow
telegraphed its intentions, the United States ignored that reality.
After Russia breached the treaty, the Obama White House initially
refused to acknowledge that it had done so. After the administration
finally acknowledged Russian violations, no consequences followed.
Similarly, for decades, Tehran has violated its nuclear commitments -
and the United States has failed to hold it accountable." http://t.uani.com/1CUZ0NB
Paula Desutter
in Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "Iran has been
violating its obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty for
over 30 years. Its nuclear program has been found to be for the
purposes of acquiring or manufacturing nuclear weapons and not, as Iran
has consistently claimed, to be for peaceful purposes. President Barack
Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, however, have a plan to make
this problem go away: a nuclear deal based on the April 1st Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Rather than continuing or
expanding the increasingly successful U.S. and international sanctions
regime designed to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons
ambitions and deny Iran the funds to advance its program, the U.S. and
the international community will declare Iran's nuclear program to be
for peaceful purposes. Iran will again commit to implement obligations
it has already violated and will be permitted to continue its nuclear
program, albeit at a modified pace. In return, the U.S. and
international sanctions regime will be castrated. Obama administration
claims of achievement and praise by supporters should be tempered by
the fact that it doesn't take a genius to reach a deal with a violator
that legitimizes its violations and removes the consequences.
While the administration has touted the 'unprecedented' verification of
this agreement, verification will be by the same International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) Iran has lied to for decades and which has never detected
an undeclared Iranian nuclear facility. The inspection and transparency
measures in the JCPOA are mostly restatements of obligations Iran has
previously agreed to and then 'suspended.' IAEA reports over the past
decade show that Iran has concealed its program and facilities and
responded to IAEA inquiries with false or misleading statements. Thus
the record of Iran's dealings with the IAEA is remarkably bad. Iran
knows the likelihood of re-imposition of sanctions by nations that have
already paid the price for imposing them once is low. Moreover, the
JCPOA provides for a 'dispute resolution process.' Once compliance
problems are taken into this process, they are unlikely to result in
the promised 'snap-back' of sanctions." http://t.uani.com/1aZIDtl
Marc Thiessen in
WashPost: "Remember Jonathan Gruber, the Obamacare
architect who as caught on tape boasting how the president had taken
advantage of the 'stupidity' of American voters to pass his health-care
law? Well it seems, Obama is applying the 'Gruber Doctrine' once again
- this time to foreign policy. The Gruber Doctrine is based on the
premise that, in the words of the now infamous MIT professor, 'lack of
transparency is a huge political advantage' and that the 'basic
exploitation of the lack of ... understanding of the American voter' is
'really, really critical' for enacting your preferred policies. That is
precisely what Obama is doing when it comes to Iran and Cuba. With Iran,
the administration is once again relying on a 'lack of transparency' to
ram through its nuclear deal. Even Iran's foreign minister dismissed
the administration's talking points describing the framework agreement
as 'spin.' Obama is warning that the only alternative to his deal is
'another war in the Middle East,' even though he has yet to reveal the
key details: Will sanctions relief be front-loaded, as Iran insists, or
will sanctions come off gradually, as the Iranians meet certain
performance benchmarks? Will there be any transparency into Iran's past
secret nuclear activity, information that is critical to verifying its
compliance today? Will there be 'snap inspections' and access to all
Iranian facilities, both civilian and military? Iran says no. Obama is
counting on the fact that Americans won't be able to follow all the
details about 'centrifuges' and 'domestic enrichment capacity.' He
won't share the details but wants us to trust him that there will be
'unprecedented verification.' If you believe that, you probably still
think that if you like your health plan, you can keep your health
plan." http://t.uani.com/1OafmZ9
UANI Outreach
Coordinator Bob Feferman in Times of Israel:
"Centrifuges are not the only thing spinning in Iran. The ink was
not even dry on the framework announced between Iran and the P5+1 when
Iranian officials began to dispute the fact sheet released by the White
House. The vast differences between the sides on this flawed and
dangerous deal are already setting off alarms across the Middle East
and throughout the world. An important resource that highlights the
discrepancies among three versions of the framework released by the
non-partisan advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) should
raise serious concerns. Take for example the issue of inspections of
Iranian facilities conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA)." http://t.uani.com/1NCOztn
|
|
Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com
United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is
united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to
become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is
an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its
own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free
of nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment