Kaukab Siddique, an associate
professor of English at Lincoln University in Oxford, Pennsylvania, has
called me and other defenders of free speech “dirty Jewish Zionist
thugs” – and of course, he refuses to retract. On the contrary, the Philadelphia Inquirer reports Kaukab Siddique spewed, “I would say it again.”
Such ideological rhetoric and hatred has
been normed by a sharia-adherent culture, and most particularly by
leftist academia. Islamic Jew-hatred has become mainstream under the
guise of “Palestinianism,” when it is actually nothing less than a
recrudescence of Nazism.
Reporter Susan Snyder validates this vile professor’s hatred in the Philadelphia Inquirer
when she describes me as “anti-Muslim.” I am not anti-Muslim, I am
anti-jihad. But if she described me that way, people would think,
“What’s wrong with that”? Snyder goes on in her article to use the
radical, far-left fringe group the Southern Poverty Law Center to smear
me even more. Mind you, all this is in an article about a Muslim
professor at an American university calling Jews, and me in particular,
“dirty Jewish Zionist thugs.” Snyder works hard to norm this depravity. She did not, of course, bother to contact me for comment.
Snyder writes that Siddique “doesn’t
regret” calling us “dirty Jewish Zionist thugs,” and quotes his
defiance: “I would say it again.” Siddique says that my organization,
the American Freedom Defense Initiative, in holding our free speech
event in Garland, Texas that was attacked by Islamic jihadists, was
committing “cultural genocide.” He added: “She did the worst, other than
killing us.”
In calling our free speech event in
Garland “cultural genocide,” Professor Siddique reveals how truly
insidious his agenda really is. Standing for free speech against violent
intimidation is “cultural genocide”? Snyder passes on this ridiculous
claim without remarking upon it. What Siddique is saying is that
violating Islam’s blasphemy laws is tantamount to mass murder — and the
only alternative is that we submit and accept those blasphemy laws.
Clearly, Snyder has no idea what is at
stake when she runs interference for this monster. She apparently
doesn’t realize that she and her fellow journalistic shills will have to
toe the Islamic supremacist line, too — or else. She is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist: she ought to know better.
I am not Siddique’s only target. Snyder
quotes Siddique saying that “one reason Bill Cosby’s accusers did not
come forward sooner could be that ‘many women are sluts’ and opposed a
‘homo uprising.’”
This, too, Snyder passes on without
comment. Imagine if a Republican or a Jew said, “many women are sluts.”
Snyder would take to the front page of the Philly Inquirer calling for their heads.
Siddique even says: “If you can’t talk
and you can’t express yourself at a university, then you can’t express
yourself anywhere.”
Snyder does not see the irony is this?
Siddique calls our defense of free speech “cultural genocide,” when in
fact, sharia is cultural genocide. Islamic history is built upon
cultural annihilations, jihad wars, and enslavements.
Undeterred, Siddique goes on to deny the
Holocaust: “Were there ovens?…If you study the pictures of Auschwitz,
there are no ovens there.” This poisonous Holocaust denier is teaching
our children.
How did we get here? The silence of
reasoned, the rational. The silence of everyone who stood silent when
they came after us, fearing they’d be labeled “Islamophobes” and
“racists” by Jew-haters and radicals. Even worse were those who, like
Donald Trump, came out against us and sided with these savages.
Snyder makes sure to include a defense of
Siddique’s keeping his position at Lincoln University: “As unpalatable
as some of these remarks may seem, professors have the right to speak
about public matters without fear of repercussion, said Gregory F.
Scholtz, of the American Association of University Professors.”
Leftist hypocrisy. Where are the
conservative voices on campus? The pro-Israel voices? There is a silent
and understood ban on such voices. On the extraordinarily rare occasion
my colleagues and I are given an opportunity to speak, madness ensues (here and here).
Worst of all, back in May, when ISIS first issued its fatwa calling for me to be murdered, Siddique wrote on Facebook:
Very cleverly, the corporate media are
trying to present the Texas situation as ISIS vs. Geller. The Prophet
Muhammmad [sic], pbuh, is the , [sic] leader of the ENTIRE UMMAH, not
just of ISIS. Two of ISIS gave their lives for the honor of the Prophet,
pbuh. We can’t do that, but the law of this land gives us the right to
speak out. ISNA, ICNA and CAIR think you can simply ignore blasphemy.
Millions embraced Islam because of Malcolm. Imagine what America’s
oppressed people think of us when we don’t speak even when our greatest
sanctity is violated? Muslims, we are waiting for Allah’s wrath to
descend on us.
Notice how he doesn’t condemn ISIS. He
says that ISIS is part of the umma, in arguing that the entire umma
should be trying to kill me, not just ISIS. Siddique is, like ISIS,
trying to enforce sharia blasphemy laws by force, trying to intimidate
the West into silence in the face of the jihad threat. That is the
entire reason why I held the event in Garland: to show that at least
some people in the free world were not going to submit to violent
intimidation, but were going to stand up for free speech, which is a
cornerstone of any free society. Siddique fears this freedom and all
free discussion and debate, for it would lead people away from his
narrow and violent belief system. He wants to blot free speech out by
means of violence, just as all of sharia is enforced by violence:
stonings, amputations, etc.
And this man is a professor at an American university.
No comments:
Post a Comment