Join UANI
NBC: "If you thought anti-American sentiment in
Iran had waned after the nuclear deal and the lifting of sanctions, you
could be wrong. Tens of thousands of Iranians marched in Tehran's Azadi
Square Thursday, chanting 'Death to America and Israel' and waving
anti-Western placards on the 37th anniversary of the country's 1979
Islamic revolution. Ahmad Norouzi, a nurse, wore a bandana on his head
that read: 'We will not allow foreign influence.' 'I have a message for
Obama,' the 37-year-old said. 'You can't do anything to us and anything
you say is a lie.' Sanaz, a 22-year-old secretary, also joined the rally.
'I am happy that I was able to come here today, and as an Iranian I can
put my fist in America's mouth and say Death to America,' said Sanaz, who
would only give one name. There were several homages in the rally to the
incident last month where 10 U.S. Navy sailors were detained by Iran's
Revolutionary Guard - including a parade float. President Hassan Rouhani
gave an address, saying that Iranians will 'never yield' to outside
pressure. 'Our nuclear victory showed to the world that Iranians are
capable of winning any battle, including diplomatic battles,' Rouhani
told the crowds." http://t.uani.com/23Z71Cj
Politico: "Iran has released new images
of the U.S. sailors who were detained last month after veering into the
country's waters. The photos and video from state television, as shared
by Iranian reporters on Twitter, show one sailor with red eyes appearing
to wipe away tears with a tissue. Previous photos released showed the
sailors on their knees with their hands behind their heads. In an earlier
video, a sailor is shown apologizing for crossing into Iranian waters.
Secretary of State John Kerry and the Obama administration thanked Iran
for its treatment of the sailors while they were in their custody
following their release. 'I'm appreciative for the quick and appropriate
response of the Iranian authorities,' Kerry said on Jan. 13. 'All
indications suggest or tell us that our sailors were well taken care of,
provided with blankets and food and assisted with their return to the
fleet earlier today.'" http://t.uani.com/1O4OHvH
The Hill: "Lawmakers in both parties
accused the Obama administration on Wednesday of bending - if not
outright breaking - a new anti-terrorism law, and of violating the
separation of powers in the process. 'The president has decided that he's
going to break this law,' House Homeland Security Committee Chairman
Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said in one of two separate hearings with
administration officials. 'This decision could have serious consequences
for our security and, perhaps more importantly, far-reaching consequences
for our democracy.' The law passed by Congress last year narrows a
program that allows millions of foreign travelers to enter the U.S.
without a visa. But according to Rep. Bennie Thompson (Miss.), the
Homeland Security Committee's top Democrat, the White House made a
'questionable' call to publicize a list of five possible categories of
people who could still travel without a visa, even though the law would
have otherwise made that impossible. Now, the administration 'is starting
to backpedal on some of those changes,' said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.),
the chairman of the House Oversight subcommittee on Government
Operations, during a second hearing later in the day. The anti-terrorism
law forbids people from participating in the visa waiver program if they
have recently traveled to or are dual citizens of Iran, Iraq, Syria and
Sudan. Those people would still be able to travel to the U.S., but would
have to undergo the lengthier process of first acquiring a visa. But when
the law was being implemented last month, the Obama administration
announced that it would expand a provision allowing it to waive the new
visa requirement for cases 'in the law enforcement or national security
interests of the United States.' The administration listed five
categories of people who might be able to travel without a visa -
including people who had traveled to Iran for business purposes since the
finalization of the nuclear deal last summer. Republicans erupted over
the move... 'It seems to me that in our effort to ... appease Iran, that
State Department made a call overriding - basically breaking the law that
we passed,' said McCaul. 'It sounds like we created a jobs program for
Iran,' added Meadows." http://t.uani.com/20XFEpC
U.S.-Iran
Relations
Military
Times: "Images
of a U.S. sailor crying in custody are being broadcast on Iran's state
television as the latest propaganda salvo from the Iranian government in
the wake of its provocative January arrest of 10 American sailors in
their waters. The latest move prompted a condemnation from the U.S. Navy,
calling the sailors' treatment 'outrageous and unacceptable.' ... The new
images sparked a fierce response from the Navy. 'As Secretary [of State
John] Kerry has said, we are disgusted by the exploitation of our Sailors
in Iranian propaganda,' said Cmdr. Kevin Stephens, spokesman for Naval
Forces Central Command, in a statement. 'The detention of our personnel
was outrageous and unacceptable.' ... In some of the most extensive
comments from the Navy to date on the sailors' treatment, Stephens said
the Iranians should have escorted the riverines from their waters and
offered assistance if mechanical issues prevented them from complying
immediately. 'Professional mariners understand that it is a duty and
obligation to assist other mariners who suffer mechanical problems or who
find themselves off track at sea,' Stephens said. 'The responsible action
for the Iranians to have taken upon discovering our RCBs in their waters
would have been to calmly and peacefully direct our RCBs out of their
territorial waters or offer assistance if the apparent mechanical issues
in one of the boats prevented them from departing immediately. It's
outrageous and unacceptable that our Sailors were held at gunpoint and
detained. We are grateful diplomacy worked at the end of the day, but it
would never have come to that had the Iranian maritime forces involved
behaved professionally and responsibly.'" http://t.uani.com/20OeJju
AFP: "Iranians waved 'Death to
America' banners and took selfies with a ballistic missile Thursday as
they marked 37 years since the Islamic revolution, weeks after Iran
finalised a nuclear deal with world powers. In the capital, hundreds of
thousands converged on the historic Azadi (Freedom) Square, where
President Hassan Rouhani was set to make a speech. Many demonstrators
carried the traditional placards reading 'Death to America' and 'Death to
Israel' while others carried the Iranian flag. Iran holds annual
celebrations commemorating its 1979 revolution... Young people at a rally
on Thursday reconstructed a scene from mid-January that saw US Navy
sailors detained by Iranian Revolutionary Guards. State television has
repeatedly broadcast pictures of the 10 sailors with their hands on their
heads. On Wednesday night, a brief video also showed one soldier in
tears... Revolutionary Guards were present on Thursday, displaying a
long-range Imad ballistic missile in central Tehran. Many people were
taking selfies with the missile, the ISNA news agency reported. Last
October, Iran 'successfully' tested the new missile, which Tehran says
has a range of 1700 kilometres (1050 miles). Local media also published
images of General Qassem Suleimani, chief of the Guards' Quds special
forces, marching in the rally. Louis Farakkhan, leader of the American
group Nation of Islam, was also to make a speech as honarary guest after
Rouhani." http://t.uani.com/1Sjm061
The Hill: "The Senate Foreign Relations
Committee on Wednesday passed a bipartisan resolution calling on Iran to
return Robert Levinson, the longest-held American citizen in U.S.
history. The committee passed the resolution, introduced by Sen. Bill
Nelson (D-Fla.) and co-sponsored by Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Marco
Rubio (R-Fla.), a presidential candidate, unanimously by voice vote. 'We
need to press [Iran] to keep their commitments,' Coons said... 'It needs
to stay on the agenda,' Levinson's son Dan told The Hill. 'We're very
encouraged it will continue to be an issue and continue to remain in the
public eye.' After the prisoner release last month, Levinson's family
spoke out in the media about a lack of communication from the government
and not knowing ahead of time about the prisoner release. Committee
Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) expressed condolences to the family. 'We
are sorry you've gone through this harrowing experience,' he said, calling
Levinson a 'patriot.' 'All of us know that, and we need to do everything
we can to get him back.' 'We'll use every avenue available to us to get a
full accounting and release, I can assure you of that,' added the
committee's ranking member, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.)." http://t.uani.com/1TamOZT
IranWire: "On Sunday, February 7, Iran's
state television broadcast footage of an exchange between US F-18
fighters and Iran's air defense system near Farsi Island in the Persian
Gulf. Although the clip features genuine images from January 12 - when
Iran's Revolutionary Guards naval unit arrested 10 American sailors -
parts of it have obviously been altered to present a more dramatic
version of events to the Iranian public. The footage, aired by Islamic
Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), shows the American pilot in charge
of the F-18 fleet announcing their approach to Farsi Island to support
and rescue US military patrol boats. The Iranian air defense center warns
them to leave the area as quickly as possible and that their personnel
will provide the necessary help to the captured sailors... Although the
Iranian authorities warn the Americans at the beginning of the footage,
the overall tone of exchange is not hostile, with the US pilot thanking
the Iranians toward the end of the clip. But General Farzad Esmaili,
commander of Khatam al-Anbia Air Defense Base, presented the chain of
events as more serious and threatening to the Iranian TV audience. 'At
first the Americans failed to reply to the warning that they must leave
the airspace around Farsi Island. But when they noticed that our missile
systems were ready and were locked on them, they immediately responded.
They had less than 30 seconds to reply, after which we would have
definitely fired missiles. We were not bluffing.' 'They were warned from
both Bandar Abbas and Bushehr [command centers] and the Revolutionary
Guards' missile installations were mobilized as well,' the commander
said. 'They realized they were being targeted by 10 or 12 missile. We
told Farsi Island to shoot any plane in its airspace, and to fire at
will.'" http://t.uani.com/1TeAqVc
Congressional
Action
The Hill: "Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.)
pledged Wednesday to work to get more funding for the group responsible
for making sure Iran doesn't cheat on the nuclear deal, suggesting
President Obama's budget request doesn't go far enough. 'As a member of
the Appropriations Committee, I am committed to doing everything I can to
increase funding for the [International Atomic Energy Agency] during the
Appropriations process,' he said in a statement. 'However, this goal is
made considerably more difficult by the administration's low baseline
request.' Coons, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, separately
told reporters that while the president is supporting a 'modest
increase,' it is less than the additional $10.6 million per year that the
IAEA is requesting to help make sure Iran is complying with the nuclear
agreement." http://t.uani.com/1o6Ao5n
Sanctions
Relief
Reuters: "A subsidiary of Russian state
defence company Rostec, United Engine-building Corporation (UEC), is
preparing a 50-70 billion rouble ($635-890 million) supply contract with
Iranian oil firm Kala Naft Tehran, Russia's TASS news agency reported on
Wednesday. If successful, the contract would further strengthen
commercial ties between Moscow and Tehran after the rolling back of
Western sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme last month. A top
adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Ali Akbar
Velayati, said in Moscow last week Iran and Russia had initialled
contracts worth around $40 billion for projects including
power-engineering and railway works. 'We have a framework contract with
Kala Naft - a subsidiary of the National Iranian Oil Company,' TASS
quoted UEC Deputy General Director Sergei Mikhailov as saying. 'We see
supplies for a large number of devices, for energy and gas-pumping
projects.'" http://t.uani.com/1QXZ351
Tasnim
(Iran):
"Russian manufacturer Uralvagonzavod will export 5,000 freight
wagons to Iran following the removal of anti-Tehran sanctions, a report
said. According to the report carried by Russia's Kommersant newspaper on
Tuesday, Iran will take delivery of all the wagons before the end of
2016. Russia's state development bank Vnesheconombank (VEB) will give a
$140-million loan to Uralvagonzavod for exporting the cars to the Islamic
Republic, the paper added." http://t.uani.com/1o2dvPJ
Bloomberg: "Iran is selling its Heavy
crude grade for March to buyers in Asia at a deeper discount to Saudi
Arabia's prices for the first time in a decade as it seeks to wrangle
market share after international sanctions ended. National Iranian Oil
Co. will offer supplies to Asia at $2.60 a barrel below the average of
Oman and Dubai grades for March, according to a company official who asked
not to be identified because of internal policy. Iran, whose pricing has
tracked Saudi Arabia's since at least 2006, is giving buyers an
additional 10-cent discount next month, according to data compiled by
Bloomberg. The fifth-largest producer in the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries is seeking to win back market share after economic
sanctions were lifted last month." http://t.uani.com/1KdEVN9
Domestic
Politics
Reuters: "Hope for change is dwindling
but not gone among supporters of Iran's main pro-reform opposition,
although its leaders remain under house arrest and pragmatist President
Hassan Rouhani looks incapable of achieving the freer society he
promised. Exiled activists insist the 'Green Movement' is not a spent
force; the struggle goes on in Iran, they say, albeit through the ballot
box rather than the kind of mass protests that it staged in 2009, only to
provoke a fierce state crackdown. Within the country, the mood is more
weary before elections this month to parliament and the Assembly of
Experts, a body which holds nominal power over the country's most
powerful authority, the supreme leader. Mass disqualifications of
reformist candidates are further undermining the chances of political and
social change to match Iranians' expectations of a better economic life
after Rouhani fulfilled his other election promise - to end international
sanctions on the country under a nuclear deal with major powers... Aref,
28, who was expelled from university for backing the Green Movement then,
typifies a disillusionment with mass action among those Iranians who
cling to hope for change. 'I took part in the 2009 protests. I was beaten
by the IRGC and Basij forces several times,' said Aref, asking that his
full name be withheld. 'It was not worth it. It was too costly. I just
want to live a free life. I want my rights as a human being to be
respected.' ... 'The opposition has no leader to inspire people. Rouhani
has failed to keep his promises over creating a freer society. People
paid a very heavy price for the 2009 unrest,' said political analyst
Hamid Farahvashian. For all the hope when Rouhani was elected in 2013,
the Green Movement is still leaderless. Mir Hossein Mousavi, a former
prime minister, and Mehdi Karoubi, a cleric and ex-speaker of parliament
who stood against Ahmadinejad, remain under house arrest where they have
been for five years." http://t.uani.com/1Wgb3QR
ICHRI: "In addition to the massive
disqualifications of moderate candidates for upcoming elections in Iran,
hardliners have implemented another strategy to prevent challenges to
their power: restricting the number of seats to important governmental
bodies in order to prevent possible inroads by moderate candidates. For
more than a year, the Assembly of Experts, the body of clerics charged
with advising and choosing the country's supreme leader, has blocked
efforts by the Ministry of Interior to increase the number of Assembly
seats in provinces where there has been population growth, because that
might open the door for more moderate candidates. The issue is of
immediate relevance: Seats for the Assembly of Experts will be voted on
in nationwide elections on February 26. Moreover, with the present
supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, 76 and ailing, the next Assembly will
almost certainly choose the next leader. Blocking an increase in Assembly
seats is against Iranian law. Deputy Interior Minister Mohammad Hossein
Moghimi said on March 15, 2015, that in accordance with the law, the
Assembly of Experts had been formally informed that because of the
population increase since 1981 (when the Assembly was first formed), the
membership should increase from 86 to 99. But following a September
debate, the Assembly agreed to add only two seats-for representatives
from the newly formed Alborz Province." http://t.uani.com/23YV53r
Reuters: "President Hassan Rouhani urged
Iran's faction-ridden elite on Thursday to seek consensus after a
hardline watchdog body disqualified thousands of moderate candidates from
two elections this month, state television said... 'Political factions
should put aside any confrontation ... we need consensus now,' Rouhani
told the Tehran crowd. 'Don't turn your backs on the ballot boxes.' ...
'Iranians will never yield to any pressure,' he said. 'Our nuclear
victory showed to the world that Iranians are capable of winning any
battle, including diplomatic battles.'" http://t.uani.com/1TeCcpk
Opinion
& Analysis
David
Schenker in WINEP:
"The tight-lipped family oligarchy in Saudi Arabia headed by a
geriatric and purportedly infirm monarch has no penchant for
transparency. Despite the opacity, the transition from King Abdullah to
King Salman has been accompanied by a perceptible shift in Saudi foreign
policy. While the fundamental contours of the Kingdom's regional posture
remain much the same, the ascendance of King Salman to the throne last
January signaled a more robust Saudi approach to countering Iranian regional
subversion. From Yemen to Syria to Lebanon, Riyadh is now pursuing an
agenda that at times stands in stark opposition to the articulated
regional policies of Washington. Saudi Arabia's more robust approach is a
reaction to the Obama Administration's diplomatic overtures to Tehran in
the context of the nuclear agreement. More broadly, though, it represents
pushback from Riyadh against what, during a January 2014 interview, The
New Yorker Magazine said President Obama envisaged as a 'new geopolitical
equilibrium' in the Gulf. In that interview, the President described an
'equilibrium developing between Sunni, or predominantly Sunni, Gulf
states and Iran in which there's competition, perhaps suspicion, but not
an active or proxy warfare.' Not surprisingly, the interview sparked
concern in Saudi Arabia. But the signing of the nuclear Framework
Agreement in April 2015 and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in
July 2015 confirmed Riyadh's fears about an American realignment in the
Gulf. The Saudis were especially concerned that the nuclear agreement
would purchase Iran immunity from US reprisal for its regionally
destabilizing behavior, which would be exacerbated by the release of over
$100 billion in frozen funds. In the months since the JCPOA was signed, the
distance between the US and Saudi Arabia has only increased as Washington
has seemingly embraced Tehran -- in Iraq and Syria -- as a potential
force for regional stability. As Washington moved closer to detente with
Tehran, Saudi Arabia has charted a new, more aggressive policy toward
Iran. The first skirmish, just three months after King Salman's
coronation -- and a month prior to the signing of the Framework Agreement
-- was in Yemen. In March 2015, a coalition led by Saudi Arabia launched
airstrikes targeting the Iran-backed, nominally Shiite Houthi rebels in
Yemen, who a week earlier had sacked the provisional capital of Aden and
drove Yemeni President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi into exile. It wasn't the
first time that the Saudis engaged in military operations against the
Houthis; Riyadh deployed troops to fight the Houthis in 2009-10, but
withdrew after three months when casualties started to mount. This time,
however, notwithstanding casualties, the high financial costs of the
campaign, and severe international criticism over extensive collateral
damage in Yemen, the Saudis have sustained operations for nearly a year.
Yemen has been the highest profile initiative in Riyadh's more aggressive
approach to Iran, but it's not the only battleground. Saudi Arabia has
been backing the Syrian rebels in their fight against the Iranian-backed
Assad regime since 2011. This support has not wavered in the face of the
September 2015 Russian military deployment, the reversal of momentum in
favor of the regime, or the Obama Administration's volte face on Assad's
continued rule in Syria. Indeed, Riyadh continues to provide materiel and
political support to the rebels. And despite the Obama Administration's
recent move closer to the Russian/Iranian position on Syria -- that Assad
can stay in power indefinitely -- King Salman continues to help the Sunni
rebels... For the Obama Administration, Riyadh's robust approach to Iran
is problematic. For example, continued Saudi support for Syrian
opposition groups could undermine the Administration's attempts to coerce
these organizations into accepting a ceasefire that leaves the Assad
regime in place. More broadly speaking, though, the real concern with the
new Saudi approach is that it represents a shift away from the
traditionally close alliance with Washington. In the aftermath of the
Syria chemical weapons red-line debacle, a move away from the 2015
commitment to remove Assad, and the nuclear deal with Iran, Riyadh has
determined that Washington is no longer a reliable ally. Judging from
these latest Saudi policy initiatives, it seems that the Kingdom has
decided to go it alone, to pursue its interests without regard for the
wishes of the US. While many believe Riyadh's Yemen campaign and its oil
policy are sowing the seeds of instability in the Kingdom, given the
Administration's track record containing Iran, for the foreseeable
future, Saudi Arabia's more activist approach is likely to endure." http://t.uani.com/20XHaIj
|
|
Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com
United Against Nuclear
Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a
commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a
regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an
issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own
interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of
nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment