Friday, July 15, 2016

Eye on Iran: US Says Iran Has Benefited from Eased Sanctions






Join UANI  
  FacebookFollow Us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
   
Top Stories

AFP: "Iran's economy has benefited notably from the removal of nuclear sanctions, US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Thursday, the one-year anniversary of the landmark deal between Tehran and major powers. But he stressed that the US will continue to apply sanctions pressure on the country over its alleged support for terror and its ballistic missile program, despite Tehran's criticisms that Washington has not fully followed through with its side of the nuclear deal. 'The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) reached one year ago today was a landmark international achievement, removing the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran while illustrating the power of economic sanctions, coupled with tough diplomacy, to bring about a safer world,' Lew said in a statement. In the year since then, he said, Iran has been able to sharply increase crude oil exports, and has opened more than 300 accounts with foreign banks to establish lines of credit worth billions of dollars. He also said the country has seen a more than $3 billion increase in planned foreign direct investment. 'We are meeting our commitments' under the JCPOA, he said." http://t.uani.com/29BGuDW

AFP: "Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has called on the United States to choose diplomacy over intimidation and to fulfill its obligations under a year-old nuclear deal with world powers. 'The Iran Deal was a triumph of diplomacy over coercion,' Zarif wrote on Twitter late Thursday, the first anniversary of the July 14, 2015 accord with Washington and five other major powers. 'Same stark choice for US today, and reminder: old methods produce same old failures. 'Progress will remain elusive as long as short-sighted bragging, lackluster implementation of obligations and tired slogans are preferred. 'Mutual respect and fulfillment of JCPOA obligations to ensure promised dividends will open new horizons,' he added, referring to the deal by its official name, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action." http://t.uani.com/29DiIqq

Politico: "The pressure group United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) has placed ads in major European newspapers, including a full-page spread in London's Financial Times in March. UANI is another privately funded advocacy group, this one founded by leading Republican and Democrat national security officials, including former CIA chief James Woolsey, who is also FDD's chairman, and Dennis Ross, who later advised Obama on Iran. Since the deal was approved, it has expanded resources warning of reputational and legal risks to doing business with a leading state sponsor of terrorism, and it's naming and shaming companies that do... By and large, observers say, the campaign to discourage business with Iran is working-though some current and former officials say Iran's regime has done more damage to its own reputation with investors and financial institutions through corruption and illicit conduct over the years than its critics have by highlighting those failings... Indeed, aside from recouping lost oil sales, the post-sanctions gold rush that many in Iran expected to flow from the nuclear deal hasn't materialized. Despite a parade of European and Asian trade and investment delegations and dozens of prospective deals written up in the press, it's hard to find a major non-oil deal that has yet come to fruition. That's in part because although Iran has reestablished relationships with second- and third-tier banks, the global financial giants needed to bankroll multi-billion dollar deals are reluctant to re-engage with Iran, fearful of the overhang of remaining non-nuclear U.S. sanctions, including an embargo on almost any commerce between Americans and Iranians." http://t.uani.com/29I5xdD

UANI in the News

Al Jazeera English: UANI President David Ibsen discusses the first anniversary of the JCPOA. http://t.uani.com/29Icv2n

Nuclear & Ballistic Missile Program

Fars (Iran): "Spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) Behrouz Kamalvandi announced that the country's experts are now testing newly-designed centrifuges. 'At present, works on IR2 and IR2M centrifuges has almost ended but they need to go through a number of more tests,' Kamalvandi said on Wednesday. He underlined Iran's capability to resume the frozen part of its nuclear activities if the powers defy their undertakings under the nuclear deal, and warned that if such a thing happens, the speed at which Iran can bring its frozen operations back into action would suprise the opposite party. 'They have seen how smart our scientists are and we are not therefore concerned about returning to the past conditions and capacities and we are able to develop even more than the past,' Kamalvandi said... Iran in January unveiled the latest generation of its centrifuges that are 15 times more powerful than its currently operating IR1. While the first generation of its centrifuges had the enrichment capacity of 1 to 1.5 SUWs, the IR8 enjoys the capacity of 15 to 20 SUWs." http://t.uani.com/29W2SfO

Trend: "The European Union intends to open an EU Delegation in Iran, High Representative of EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini announced. 'The European Union supports a strategy of gradual engagement that is comprehensive in scope, cooperative where there is mutual interest, critical when there are differences and constructive in practice. As part of that, the European Union intends to open an EU Delegation in Iran,' Mogherini said in a declaration on behalf of the EU on the one year anniversary of the nuclear deal (JCPOA) clinched between Tehran and the world powers." http://t.uani.com/29Yg5BL

TASS (Russia): "A meeting of the Joint commission of Iran and a group of six world powers (five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany) on the implementation of the nuclear deal will be held in Vienna on July 19, Russian Permanent Representative to the International Organizations in Vienna Vladimir Voronkov told TASS on Thursday. According to Voronkov, the meeting will focus on the problems with surplus enriched uranium and compliance with the limits of heavy water stocks. 'There are two issues that need to be addressed,' he said. 'These are the difficulties with enriched uranium accumulated during the enrichment in the pipes and other devices. What has been discovered exceeds the allowed limit of 300 kilograms. And the second issue is heavy water.'" http://t.uani.com/29IwZUg

U.S.-Iran Relations

Al-Monitor: "Iran's nuclear negotiator Hamid Baeidinejad said that if American lawmakers prevent the sale of passenger airplanes to Iran, it would be a violation of the nuclear agreement between his country and the six world powers... Baeidinejad said that if the US Congress successfully blocks the sale of airplanes to Iran and prevents other companies from also selling to Iran, 'it is certainly a violation of BARJAM and we will confront it.' ... During the press conference, Baeidinejad also tried to temper expectations about the economic benefits of the nuclear deal and urged patience for Iranians growing restless waiting to see the economic benefits of the deal. 'Only a few months have passed since the [January] implementation of BARJAM, and we are at the beginning of the road,' he said. 'We never envisioned an easy path for the implementation of BARJAM.' ... 'BARJAM is not an economic or trade agreement. Our view of BARJAM must not be that of a trade agreement.' He stressed, 'Expectations of BARJAM must be realistic.'" http://t.uani.com/29H7i6y

Congressional Action

Reuters: "The U.S. House of Representatives passed two pieces of legislation linked to the international nuclear agreement with Iran on Thursday, one year after the landmark pact was announced, defying President Barack Obama's veto threat. Voting largely along party lines, the Republican-controlled House voted 246 to 179 to pass a new set of sanctions on Iran, and 246 to 181 for a measure to block Iran's access to the U.S. financial system, including use of the dollar. The House on Wednesday passed a bill to bar the U.S. purchase of 'heavy water,' also with little backing from Democrats... The measures were among the last the House passed before Congress left Washington for a seven-week summer recess. There was no word on when, or whether, the measures would be taken up in the Senate." http://t.uani.com/29JydA2

AP: "President Barack Obama marked the anniversary of the landmark nuclear deal with Iran on Thursday by vowing that the United States and its partners will uphold their commitments as long as Iran abides by the pact. Congressional Republicans again tried to undermine the international accord, which outlines what Iran must do to pull back its nuclear program from the brink of weapons-making capacity... Obama said in a statement Thursday that the deal has succeeded in rolling back Iran's nuclear program, 'avoiding further conflict and making us safer.' The Republican-controlled House, meanwhile, approved a bill to impose new sanctions on Iran for its continuing development and testing of its ballistic missile program. The 246-179 vote was largely along party lines. Lawmakers also were considering a measure that would restate U.S. policy to deny the Iranian government and banks access to U.S. dollars. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, said the Obama administration has shown it does not intend to hold Iran accountable for its ballistic missile program, human rights violations and support of terrorism. 'We want to penalize the Iranian government for their continued illegal activity,' McCarthy, R-Calif., said of congressional Republicans." http://t.uani.com/29BGxjk

Politico: "Fifteen Senate Democrats are urging President Barack Obama to secure more transparency from the inspectors tasked with verifying Iran's compliance with last year's controversial nuclear deal, according to a letter obtained by POLITICO. Led by Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, the Democrats are asking Obama to use the federal government to push the International Atomic Energy Agency to publish details about Iran's nuclear program to ensure independent verification that they are following the terms of the deal, which relaxed sanctions on Iran in return for a drawdown of its nuclear arms program. The IAEA has found that Iran is in compliance with the deal, but is not fully disclosing the amount of centrifuges Iran is using to enrich Uranium nor the amount of enriched Uranium that Iran currently has, the Democrats said. 'In addition to lacking vital information on the status of Iran's uranium stock and enrichment capabilities, the report leaves out vital details on Iranian facilities. The report does not comment on the progress made in transitioning Fordow to a research facility or provide updates on the redesign of the Arak heavy water research reactor. This data is critical for ensuring the ability to independently verify Iran's compliance,' reads the letter... In addition to Peters, the letter is signed by Sens. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Cory Booker (N.J.), Bob Casey (Pa.), Chris Coons (Del.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), Tim Kaine (Va.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), Jon Tester (Mont.), Mark Warner (Va.), Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.) and Ron Wyden (Ore.). All of them supported the deal, which is now a year old and is facing renewed attacks from Republicans." http://t.uani.com/29ObF1C

Iran Primer: "Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) organized 33 of their colleagues to sign a bipartisan letter urging the Obama administration to rigorously enforce sanctions on Iran's illicit, non-nuclear activities - namely its support for terrorism, development of ballistic missiles, and human rights abuses. The lawmakers emphasized the need to maintain the restriction on Iran's ability to conduct transactions with U.S. dollars." http://t.uani.com/29VYA8n

Free Beacon: "Congress is pursuing new legislation that would force the Obama administration to disclose details about a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded payment to Iran that multiple sources have described as a 'ransom payment' to the Islamic Republic, the Washington Free Beacon has learned. The legislation, which comes on the one-year anniversary of the nuclear agreement with Iran, would force the administration to provide additional details about the payment and prohibit future taxpayer-funded payouts to Iran and other state sponsors of terrorism, according to the legislation... Sens. James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Deb Fischer (R., Neb.), who are spearheading the new bill, said U.S. taxpayers should be told why their money is being sent to the globe's top sponsor of terrorist activities." http://t.uani.com/29YghAX

Business Risk

WSJ: "Companies remain wary of entering Iran in the year since global powers struck an agreement to freeze Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, according to sanctions experts. While officials trotted out statements commemorating the July 14, 2015, signature of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, the consensus was the nuclear deal with Iran is holding but is fragile. Companies, though, don't consider Thursday to be the one-year anniversary of the agreement; they point to the Jan. 16, 2016, implementation as the important day to commemorate, said Douglas Jacobson, a partner at international trade-focused firm Jacobson Burton Kelley PLLC. He called any real assessment of the deal's effectiveness 'premature' and noting it's still in its early stages. 'We're only in the first chapter and the rest of the book hasn't even been written,' said Mr. Jacobson. Companies have spent the last six months 'putting their big toe in the swimming pool' to evaluate their prospects in Iran, said Mr. Jacobson, and they are working through the various compliance hurdles that remain despite the lifting of nuclear-related U.S. and international sanctions. 'We're still in the very early phases of even understanding the overall impact on commercial business of the implementation of the JCPOA,' he said." http://t.uani.com/2afyp8C

Sanctions Relief

Al-Monitor: "Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, a top nuclear negotiator who now heads the staff overseeing implementation of the nuclear deal, sat down with Iranian television July 11 to update the public on the status of the deal. Ongoing US sanctions on Iran that prohibit international investors from using the dollar for transactions with it are one of the main obstacles keeping Iran from taking advantage of the nuclear deal and international sanctions relief. These banking sanctions have created reservations among many foreign companies eager to do business with Iran. Aragchi explained that they are primary sanctions - that is, ones unrelated to the nuclear deal. Aragchi said that although the central bank of Iran had told Iranian nuclear negotiators that this was an important issue that needed to be addressed, the Americans did not agree to lift the banking sanctions. Aragchi also remarked that if Iran were to negotiate on these sanctions, it would have to offer additional concessions. Citing US court rulings confiscating billions of dollars belonging to Iran, Aragchi said Iran would prefer to remain outside the US dollar system... According to Aragchi, Iran is currently selling 2 million barrels of oil a day, 500,000 barrels below previous levels. 'This will take time,' he cautioned, comparing it to reconstruction after the Iran-Iraq War, which required months and years." http://t.uani.com/29I0yXB

Reuters: "Iran signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Russia's Zarubezhneft on Tuesday for a feasibility study on two joint fields in the west of the country, according to oil ministry news agency SHANA. It is the latest of several MoUs the ministry has signed since the lifting of international sanctions on Tehran in January. Countries seeking long-term oil cooperation include China, India, South Korea and some European states. Iran needs foreign investment for repairs and upgrading of its oil and gas fields. It also seeks the transfer of technology to its oil industry after a decade of isolation. Many Western and Asian oil companies are still waiting for Tehran to unveil its new oil and gas contracts (IPCs) with new terms. In the absence of that, many MoUs are still being signed, especially in last two months." http://t.uani.com/29S8KW7

Reuters: "The Iranian government has signed a deal with Italy's highway agency ANAS for the construction and management of a 1,200 km (745 miles) road project that will cost 3.6 billion euros ($4 billion), ANAS said on Thursday. The first stretch of highway covering 350 km will be completed by 2022 at a cost of 600 million euros, ANAS said. The project is to build a road linking the Gulf port of Bandar Imam Khomeini to Bazargah on Iran's border with Turkey.Italy has worked hard to secure lucrative deals in Iran following a deal last year to lift crippling sanctions on Tehran in exchange for limiting its nuclear activities... ANAS said the deal signed on Thursday with the Iranian Ministry of Roads was a follow-up to a memorandum of understanding initialed in February." http://t.uani.com/29Jw5bF

Reuters: "South Korea's crude imports from Iran jumped nearly 115 percent in June from a year earlier as cheaper prices for Iranian condensate prompted Asia's major ultra-light oil buyer to boost purchases of the oil products last month. Seoul brought in 1.04 million tonnes of Iranian crude oil last month, or 254,653 barrels per day (bpd), more than two times higher than 485,182 tonnes imported a year earlier when sanctions were imposed on Tehran, its customs office data showed on Friday. The world's fifth-largest crude oil importer brought in 6.12 million tonnes, or 246,522 bpd, of crude from the Middle Eastern country in the first half of this year. That was almost 108 percent higher than 2.95 million tonnes in the same period in 2015, according to the data... June's volume was expected to soar as two South Korean buyers, refiners SK Energy and Hanwha Total Petrochemical Co were set to lift at least 6 million barrels of Iranian South Pars condensate (SPC) in June.'" http://t.uani.com/29VVfWT

TASS (Russia): "The National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) has signed a basic non-disclosure agreement with Russia's state-owned energy giant Zarubezhneft over two oil fields in the western Iran, NIOC said in a statement. Under the agreement, the Russian company will study West Paydar and Aban oil fields and will present its proposals to increase the recovery rate of both fields to the NIOC." http://t.uani.com/29yxfrO

TASS (Russia): "Gazprombank is starting activity in Iran among other Russian banks, Akbar Komijani, deputy governor of Iran's Central Bank is quoted as saying by the Bloomberg agency. Komijani said he has held talks in St. Petersburg with 'big Russian banks.'" http://t.uani.com/29MmMb0

Extremism

BBC: "A recent trend among Iranians to wear clothing emblazoned with English-language writing has prompted alarm in the official media. A report on state-run Channel Two highlighted what it called a fashion to put 'obscene', 'Satanist' and 'anti-religious' messages on men's T-shirts and women's tops. Set to ominous music of the sort usually reserved for exposes of serious wrongdoing, the report features people sporting phrases such as 'love', 'not normal' and 'no rules' on their outfits. One shot shows a person with their face blurred wearing a top with the words 'Friday Night'. Of particular concern seems to be a women's range with the humorous slogan 'Keep calm I'm Queen'. It's apparently inspired by the popular British 'Keep calm and carry on' image, but the TV channel has a different take, telling viewers that 'queen' is a US slang term to describe 'men who look like women.'" http://t.uani.com/29FxufO

Human Rights

RFE/RL: "The mother of jailed Iranian human rights defender Narges Mohammadi has called on President Hassan Rohani to intervene in the case of her daughter, who has been on hunger strike for two weeks. Mohammadi, one of Iran's top rights activists, has reportedly refused to eat since June 27 to protest a refusal by prison officials to allow her to speak to her Paris-based children on the phone.  'In this country, being a mother is a crime,' writes Mohammadi's mother, Ozra Bazargan, in an open letter addressed to Rohani. Bazargan called on Rohani to work to allow Mohammadi to speak to her 9-year-old twins. She added that, as an Iranian citizen and a mother, she expects Rohani to intervene to so that 'the life of my daughter is not endangered further.' Amnesty International says Mohammadi suffers from several medical conditions and the hunger strike 'critically endangers her health and life.'" http://t.uani.com/29TLRDc

Opinion & Analysis

UANI Advisory Board Member Giulio Terzi in The Hill: "On July 14, it will be exactly one year since the nuclear agreement between Iran and the P5+1 group of nations was concluded in Vienna. It will be an opportunity for the proponents of those controversial negotiations with Iran to face some harsh realities about the nature of the regime. Anyone who understood Iran's clear patterns of past behavior should have realized how dim were the chances of a 'Nuclear Deal' - the JCPOA - in getting from the regime political moderation and compliance with international norms. Yet that didn't stop a wide segment of political and economic establishments in both the US and Europe from embracing Iranian President Hassan Rouhani as a moderate and holding onto that embrace right up to the present day. A one-sided and untruthful narrative has been willingly spread, to support Iran policies based on plain ignorance of recent history. Many aspects have been either neglected or twisted. The negative experience of Western Governments, when they have tried to reach out to 'moderates' inside the Iranian regime, was completely overlooked, since every attempt has been burned by those same 'moderates' - each more predictably than the last. In the year since Rouhani's charm offensive led to his securing relief from economic sanctions, he has shown himself to be just as duplicitous and deceptive as former Presidents Mohammad Khatami and Akbar Rafsanjani. With them, American and European Governments made huge efforts in promoting dialogue and understanding about the most important regional and bilateral issues. But that outreach ultimately led to intensification of anti-Western rhetoric and crackdowns on actual reformist trends within Iranian society. President Rouhani himself is now part of the escalating rhetoric that is emerging out of the nuclear agreement. In October 2015 Iran did test a ballistic missile with nuclear capacity - a violation of UN Security Council resolutions that could imply sanctions broader than those the Obama administration has already established. Carelessly, in the midst of international outcry the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps carried out other missile tests: four more, as we know. It did so with the explicit blessing of President Rouhani. When faced with light enforcement measures by the US, Rouhani ordered his Defense Ministry to ramp up production of these weapons. The Iranian President apparently believed that his American counterpart would not respond to further Iranian provocations. He was right. None of the latest missile tests drew countermeasures or reactions." http://t.uani.com/29MXg6p

UANI Advisory Board Member Ray Takeyh & Reuel Marc Gerecht in Foreign Affairs: "As the U.S. campaign season wears on, both Republicans and Democrats are pledging to stay tough on Iran. Such promises aren't new. Last summer, as the Barack Obama administration unveiled its nuclear agreement, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry assured skeptics that the United States would sustain essential sanctions that punish Tehran for its aid to terrorists, regional aggression, and human rights abuses. For her part, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has echoed Kerry's determination to hold Iran accountable for its malevolent non-nuclear behavior. But Clinton and Kerry's position contains a crippling contradiction. Washington can either accommodate or confront the clerical regime. It can't do both. And confrontation is made difficult, if not impossible, by the nuclear agreement and a war-weary public that is eager to be free of the Middle East. In the year since the nuclear agreement was concluded, Tehran has continued its development of long-range ballistic missiles, a historic signpost of a state with atomic weapons ambitions. The regime hasn't cut its leash on the Iraqi government; Iranian Revolutionary Guards dictate Baghdad's strategies against the Islamic State (ISIS) and encourage a hardline approach toward Iraqi Sunnis. And Tehran has ensured the survival and success of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's war machine, to the point that even Washington has become eager to dispense with the mantra 'Assad must go.' Syria, after all, is where the United States' redlines go to die." http://t.uani.com/29BJvEz

Sen. Marco Rubio in NRO: "One year ago today, President Obama announced the start of the flawed nuclear deal that he claimed would prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Unfortunately, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has made America less safe. It at best only delays Iran's nuclear-weapons program and does nothing to protect Israel and our allies in the region from Tehran's continued nefarious activities. The Obama administration has gone to great lengths to save this deal. Administration officials have boasted of creating an 'echo chamber' with reporters ensuring that journalists parroted the administration's line and ignored worrisome details about the deal. Over the last year, Iran has continued to endanger our troops and allies in the region and further its quest for regional domination... Tehran has exploited the JCPOA to destabilize the region and expand its nefarious activities, including provocations against Americans and Israel. Those of us opposed to this fundamentally flawed deal are not going to give up. We will continue to fight to hold Tehran accountable for its actions even if President Obama continues to fail to do so." http://t.uani.com/29JAs6q

Eric Edelman, Mike Makovsky & Jonathan Ruhe in USA Today: "The year since the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Iran's nuclear program was announced has been a strategic windfall for Iran and a disaster for the United States. Many of the deal's shortcomings were glaring from the beginning, yet they have been magnified by serial and gratuitous U.S. concessions to unilateral Iranian demands. Both parties are about to formally choose their presidential nominees, and whoever becomes president must develop a coherent strategy to address the challenges created by the JCPOA and its implementation. The first step is admitting there's a problem: Current U.S. policy is guided by several fallacies the Obama administration employed to sell the deal over disapproving majorities in Congress and the American public. The administration claimed this agreement would prevent a nuclear Iran, but in reality it allows Iran to ramp up its nuclear infrastructure and then expires. As the name suggests, the JCPOA is touted as comprehensive, however, it only addresses one component of nuclear weapons capability - enrichment - with no restrictions on the other two: means of delivery and weaponization activities. Administration officials emphasized the agreement would make Iran's nuclear program transparent, yet we know dangerously lessnow than before the JCPOA. This undercuts another claim, that there are no side deals, since the reducing reporting by inspectors on Iran's enrichment under the agreement had not been spelled out before it was announced. In Congressional testimony administration officials repeatedly said the United States would maintain pressure on Tehran during the JCPOA. Instead, the administration repeatedly lowered the heat, thereby diminishing American credibility regionally and globally. It is so invested in the deal that it avoids any tension, even when Iran threatens the United States." http://t.uani.com/29BIFaI

Hadi Ghaemi in WPR: "There is a crackdown underway in Iran. But it is no longer just a crackdown on dissent. Rather it is an attempt to crush views or expressions that depart from the insular and rigid worldview of an increasingly small band of hard-liners. It is not opposition parties, secularists or even reformists that are the latest targets of repression, but longtime insiders and scions of the Islamic Republic; a conservative and clerically vetted president and his administration; and revered cultural figures whose music, art and writings have long been the pride of Iranians. These are the new targets of repression, and they are indicative of a shifting domestic political context in Iran in which the base of the regime is shrinking, the range of permitted views is narrowing, and the gulf between the state and society is widening. As a result, this base is fearful and reactive. It is made up of the Revolutionary Guards, intelligence and security agencies, the judiciary, hard-line members of Iran's parliament, ultraconservative clerics, and above all the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Perhaps they have cause for concern. At every opportunity, the Iranian electorate has used its limited powers of political participation to elect centrist officials who eschew vitriol against the world, welcome conflict resolution, and seek the country's international economic integration and revitalization... Activists and human rights defenders like Bahareh Hedayat, Narges Mohammadi and Abdolfattah Soltani have been joined in prison by reformists-and then by journalists and internet professionals, and later by anyone who expressed independent views on social media. Writers, artists, musicians and poets whose work didn't conform to ultraconservative cultural views have been targeted next, followed by members of the Rouhani administration's inner circle and professionals working within it. Dual nationals who recently traveled to Iran-such as charity worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and Homa Hoodfar, a professor of anthropology at Concordia University in Montreal-have been detained too, as part of the strategy to supposedly prevent so-called Western infiltration. And the judiciary capped these growing arrests with harsher and longer sentences." http://t.uani.com/2adFeYg
       

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment